Law Society welcomes temporary solution to Wairarapa lawyer shortage

Press Release – New Zealand Law Society
The New Zealand Law Society welcomes any solution, even temporary, that will offer relief to a shortage in family legal aid lawyers in Wairarapa.

But it stresses asking lawyers in other areas to assist is a short term fix which doesn’t address the fundamental problems causing the shortage of lawyers.

The Ministry of Justice says it has been in contact with family legal aid lawyers based in Palmerston North and Upper Hutt and several have indicated they will take on cases in Wairarapa if required.

It says there are currently just seven family legal aid lawyers working in Wairarapa, down from nine after two recently left the region. In the past it has been as high as 11.

The ministry’s manager of legal aid services, Tracey Baguley, says it’s important that people receive legal representation when they need it.

“The number of lawyers taking on legal aid work goes up and down, and from time-to-time in smaller communities, such as Wairarapa, we may see a need to bring in outside lawyers,” she says.

New Zealand Law Society Family Law Section chair Michelle Duggan says it’s great if it means that unmet legal needs are being taken care of and people are getting representation; however it is not a long term solution.

“Not by a long shot; yet that is what’s needed. There is a shortage of legal aid lawyers but the ministry just won’t properly examine as to why this is. What will happen in six months’ time and will these lawyers from outside the region still be available?” she says.

Ms Duggan says there are a range of reasons why it is difficult to keep family legal aid lawyers in any provincial area.

“It’s very hard work. It’s often urgent work and you’re essentially being asked to drop whatever other legal work you’re doing and attend to it. It doesn’t pay well for lawyers working for firms which is why most people that do legal aid work are sole practitioners, because we’re the only ones with the overheads that make it manageable,” she says.

However, Michelle Duggan says sole practitioners then have the problem of not being in a position to employ a junior lawyer to train.

“These are some of the substantive issues the ministry needs to address and the Law Society has not been silent on this issue. We have brought up these problems on numerous occasions,” she says.

Ms Duggan says the shortfall of family legal aid lawyers is not just a Wairarapa problem as it has been evident in both Blenheim and Westport too. She says the Law Society has brought the shortage of legal aid family lawyers to the attention of the ministry a number of times in the past.

Content Sourced from scoop.co.nz
Original url

Go to Source

UK to set out plan for converting EU laws into domestic law post-Brexit

LONDON The British government will set out plans on Thursday to convert European Union laws into domestic legislation to give “businesses, workers and consumers the certainty they need” as Britain exits the bloc.

A day after British Prime Minister Theresa May launched the formal divorce process, saying there was no turning back, her government will publish a formal policy document on its “Great Repeal Bill”.

The White Paper, which sets out the government’s proposals for future legislation, will, according to Brexit minister David Davis, end “the supremacy of lawmakers in Brussels” but also give a legal framework for firms to be able to plan.

“At the heart of the referendum decision was sovereignty. A strong, independent country needs control of its own laws. That process starts now,” Davis said in a statement.

“Converting EU law into UK law … will mean that as we seek a comprehensive new economic partnership with the EU, our allies will know that we start from a position where we have the same standards and rules.”

Some companies have said they cannot plan without knowing what comes after Brexit, forcing them to put investment programmes on hold and sometimes delaying major infrastructure projects.

By converting the body of EU law into British legislation, May’s government hopes to ease those concerns by offering that “wherever practical, the same rules and laws will apply after exit day”.

“It will then be for elected politicians in this country to make changes in the national interest,” the Brexit ministry said.

(Reporting by Elizabeth Piper; Editing by Louise Ireland)


Go to Source

BS-III ban: Auto firms scramble to liquidate stocks

NEW DELHI: With over 8 lakh vehicles worth up to Rs 20,000 crore hit by the Supreme Court order to ban BS III vehicles from April 1, auto companies are scrambling to liquidate stocks and upgrade besides considering export options to minimise the impact.

According to industry estimates the total value of the impacted vehicles is between Rs 15,000 to Rs 20,000 crore. Around 6.71 lakh two-wheelers, 97,000 commercial vehicles and over 40,000 three wheelers are affected by the ban.

“Given the current demand, majority of the vehicles in the pipeline have already been sold. Some more will be sold in the next couple of days where we have customer orders,” Ashok Leyland MD and CEO Vinod K Dasari said in a statement.

The little inventory that is left would be exported to other markets where the company has significant presence and which still operate on BS III norms, he added.

“Finally, for any other vehicles still leftover, the company confirms that it will be able to easily upgrade them to BS IV at minimal cost,” Dasari said.

Dasari, who is also the President of industry body SIAM, said the Supreme Court verdict banning BS III vehicles from April will have to be respected but it is “frustrating” that the existing law allowing sale of these vehicles was ignored.

He said commercial vehicle makers have been producing BS IV units since 2010 but they have been selling BS III for the last seven years because of lack of fuel.

Stating that as per government notification, sales of BS III vehicles were allowed after April 1, he said: “Now suddenly those BS III vehicles are banned. I find it quite frustrating that something like this happens.”

The main issue for the industry has been the availability of BS IV fuel across the country, he added.

On the impact of the verdict, Dasari said: “There will be utter chaos in the next few days for the dealers and the finance companies which have sold BS III.”

Country’s largest two wheeler maker Hero MotoCorp said it carefully planned a proactive move to switch from BS III to BS IV compliant products across all its range well in time and have been producing only BS IV compliant products since one month before the given deadline.

“We have reduced our inventory significantly in the past few months with the aim to minimise our stakeholder losses. However, environmental protection will take precedence over temporary financial benefits,” Hero MotoCorp Chairman , Managing Director and CEO Pawan Munjal said.

Supporting the Supreme Court order, Daimler India Commercial Vehicles Managing Director and CEO Erich Nesselhauf said: “Today’s decision of the Supreme Court reassures us in our belief that industry interests must go together with the interests of the society at large.”

The BS-IV standard will bring much needed improvements in terms of air quality, to the benefit of the people and the environment, he added.

“At BharatBenz, we had made the strategic decision last year to only focus on BS-IV vehicles…consequently, we gradually phased out BS-III in our business system and have made the switch to produce only BS-IV vehicles in March, exactly according to plan,” Nesselhauf said.

Bajaj Auto Managing Director Rajiv Bajaj said: “There are some things on which you can’t put a price. This is for the future of our children. This is a matter of principle.”

Although the notification says “production, not sales from April 1”, but “you have to read what is unwritten”, he said.

Similarly, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Vice-Chairman Vikram Kirloskar said: “We have to go towards meeting global standards of emission and safety, and that is the only way forward.”

Toyota Kirloskar stopped manufacturing of BS III vehicles more than a year ago and all its vehicles currently being sold in India are BS IV compliant.

Two-wheeler maker Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India said: “We respect the honourable Supreme Court’s decision and confirm that all our products comply with BSIV norms.”

Car market leader Maruti Suzuki is least affected by the order and has been making BS IV vehicles since 2010. Hyundai Motor India said it respects the court’s decision and confirmed that all its products complied with BS IV norms.

Commenting on the implications of the order, EY Partner and automotive sector leader Rakesh Batra said: “The Supreme Court decision will result in difficulties for the entire automotive value chain, on top of cost increases to comply with BSIV vehicle production and GST implementation.”

This industry works globally on 20 to 30 days inventory within the distribution channel and this should have considered as part of the transition plan when migrating from BS III to BS IV, he added.

“Unfortunately a last minute decision does not help any of the industry stakeholders or consumers, in the month of March when volumes are higher due to year-end purchases and deals,” Batra said.

Credit rating agency ICRA said that CV segment will be the most impacted on account of sizeable inventory levels and due to potential costs associated with inventory re-call from dealers and upgradation to BS-IV norms.

Stay updated on the go with Times of India News App. Click here to download it for your device.

Go to Source

N166bn Contracts: CSNAC Petitions ICPC Over Abuse Of Procurement Law By Fashola

The Civil Society Network Against Corruption (CSNAC) has urged the Independent Corrupt Practices (and other related offences) Commission (ICPC) to commence investigation on issues around the Bureau of Public Procurement’s query to the Minister of Works, Power and Housing, Mr. Babatunde Fashola, over the award of contracts worth N166 billion.

In a petition forwarded to the anti-graft commission and signed by CSNAC’s chairman, Mr. Olanrewaju Suraju, the coalition said the crux of the query to Fashola was in respect of purported violation of the laws guiding contract awards in Nigeria, especially in the manner they selected contractors for the projects.

The petition also said issues were raised by the BPP as to why the costs of some of the projects were inflated and why some were awarded to unqualified firms.

The anti-graft coalition took its cue from a special report of an online newspaper, Premium Times, of January 25, 2017, where some issues surrounding the BPP’s query of the Minister of Works, Power & Housing, Babatunde Fashola, over the award of roads and bridges contract worth over N166 billion were revealed.

The petition said the construction of the roads and bridges, spread across the country, were appropriated for in the ministry’s 2016 budget.

“The projects are the rehabilitation of Numan-Jalingo Road awarded to Deux Projects Ltd for N11.7 billion; replacement of substandard bridges along Gusau-Sokoto Road awarded to Triacta Nig. Ltd (N1.01 billion); construction of Ojutu Bridge in Ilobu, Osun State awarded to Halicass Integrated Ltd (N522.2 million); the construction of Ohan-Moro Bridge on Ilorin-Igbeti Road awarded to Bonus Nig. Ltd (N942.6 million); and rehabilitation of Abuja-Kaduna Road awarded to CGC Nig. Ltd (N26.9 billion).

“Others are rehabilitation of Kaduna-Zaria Road in Katsina State awarded to Arab Contractors Nig. Ltd for N14.8 billion; rehabilitation of Zaria-Kano Road in Kaduna/Kano State awarded to Reynold Construction Nig. Ltd (N69.9 billion); and the construction of Burga-Dull-Mbatill-Tadnum-Gpbiya-Badagari-Gwaranga-Sum, Bauchi State awarded to Rahama Civil Works Nig. Ltd (N10.9 billion).

“The construction of Tudun Wuss-Wandi-Wandi-Baraza-Durr-Zumbul-Polchi-Dot-Kwanar Road, Bauchi State awarded to Dalum Construction Nig. at N12.2 billion and the construction of Pankshin-Tapshin-Gambar-Sara-Kai-Gindiri Road in Plateau State awarded to Metropolitan Construction Company Limited at N15.3 billion are also among the contracts slated for award by the ministry.”

CSNAC said it was revealed that, in line with the requirement of the Public Procurement Act, 2007, Mr. Fashola’s ministry had, in a letter dated November 7, 2016, requested the Bureau to issue it Due Process Certificate of “No Objection” for the award of the 10 contracts and that the ministry had earlier in June advertised the projects in some national newspapers as well as the Federal Tenders Journal edition of Monday May 30- June 10, 2016.

“On July 25, 2016, the pre-qualification documents were opened in the Conference Room of the ministry in the presence of representatives of prospective contractors, non-governmental organisations, the Nigeria Society of Engineers and some member of the public as well as officials of the ministry.

“In line with Part V, Clause 22, Section 4 of the Pubic Procurement Act (PPA) 2007, the Permanent Secretary/Chairman of the Ministerial Tenders Board constituted a Technical Evaluation Committee to evaluate the tenders received from prospective contractors.The contractors successful in the technical evaluation exercise were “provisionally prequalified”, with their documents forwarded to the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), and banks for verification, following which they were subsequently invited to submit completed financial tender documents.

“The ministry then carried out a verification exercise on some of the claims made by bidders in their technical bids.After the verification exercise, the ministry wrote to the BPP to request certificate of no objection for the recommended contractors.

“However, the BPP objected to the award of the contracts citing various violations of the PPA Act, insisting that it would not grant the ministry due process certificate until its concerns were adequately addressed.

Some of the concerns raised are, “No evidence that feasibility and financial/economic studies were conducted during projects’ preparation.

“Failure to prepare or submit Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Due Process Review of the projects and failure to submit the technical bids for the companies that participated in the pre-qualification exercise, among others.”

The BPP complained that the above has made the bench-marking and value-for-money checks almost unfeasible and has opened avenues to subject the procurement processes to many frivolous petitions and counter-petitions that could likely delay the immediate commencement and execution of the projects.

CSNAC said it is in view of the unresolved concerns and the fact that failure to comply with specified laws and provisions of the Bureau of Public Procurements may likely be an undertone of some corrupt practices in the procurement process, “that we are requesting that you use your good offices to investigate the above especially against the backdrop of the allegations of inflation of project sums.

“The above investigation by your office is necessary in other to ensure that the current administration’s stance against corruption is not mere lip service and to guarantee that all and every individual or institution involved in corrupt practices to the detriment of the development and progress of our society are brought to book,” the coalition said.



Go to Source

Providence official seeks study on socially conscious firms

The head of Providence’s city council says he wants a commission to come up with guidelines for socially responsible business practices for the city to use when deciding with whom to do business.

Council President Luis Aponte tells The Providence Journal (http://bit.ly/2o6EEoY ) that staff is looking into how the panel would be set up. He wants to roll out the plan next month.

He says he wants suggestions and proposals on how to balance the city’s fiscal needs with a social conscience.

The City Council Ordinance Committee effectively killed a proposed law that urged officials not to do deal with banks that help fund the Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota.

Aponte promised to create the study commission and committee members have supported the idea.

Go to Source

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of Citizens Financial Group Inc. – CFG

NEW YORK, March 29, 2017 /PRNewswire/ — Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of  Citizens Financial Group Inc. (“Citizens” or the “Company”)

CFG, -1.54%

   Such investors are advised to contact Robert S. Willoughby at rswilloughby@pomlaw.com or 888-476-6529, ext. 9980.

The investigation concerns whether Citizens and certain of its officers and/or directors have engaged in securities fraud or other unlawful business practices. 

[Click here to join a class action]

On March 29, 2017, The Wall Street Journal reported that eleven current and former Citizens branch employees in five states claimed that information about certain customer meetings, a component of a “financial checkup” program touted by Citizens, was “fabricated by those employees or others as they struggled to meet goals set by the bank.” 

On this news, Citizens’ share price fell $0.54, or 1.54%, to close at $34.49 on March 29, 2017.

The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York, Chicago, Florida, and Los Angeles, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 80 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomerantzlaw.com

CONTACT:Robert S. Willoughby
Pomerantz LLP
rswilloughby@pomlaw.com

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/shareholder-alert-pomerantz-law-firm-investigates-claims-on-behalf-of-investors-of-citizens-financial-group-inc—cfg-300431571.html

SOURCE Pomerantz LLP

Copyright (C) 2017 PR Newswire. All rights reserved

Go to Source

N166b contracts: CSNAC petitions ICPC over abuse of procurement law by Fashola

Babatunde Fashola 4

The Civil Society Network Against Corruption has urged the Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission to commence investigation on issues around the Bureau of Public Procurement’s query to the Minister of Works, Power and Housing, Babatunde Fashola, over the award of contracts worth N166 billion.
In a petition forwarded to the anti-graft commission and signed by CSNAC’s Chairman, Olanrewaju Suraju, the coalition said the crux of the query to Fashola was in respect of purported violation of the laws guiding contract awards in Nigeria, especially in the manner they selected contractors for the projects.
The petition also said issues were raised by the BPP as to why the costs of some of the projects were inflated and why some were awarded to unqualified firms.
The anti-graft coalition took its cue from a special report of an online newspaper, Premium Times, of January 25, 2017, where some issues surrounding the BPP’s query Fashola over the award of roads and bridges contracts worth over N166 billion were revealed.
The petition said the construction of the roads and bridges, spread across the country, were appropriated for in the ministry’s 2016 budget.
CsNAC said: “The projects are the rehabilitation of Numan-Jalingo Road awarded to Deux Projects Ltd for N11.7 billion; replacement of substandard bridges along Gusau-Sokoto Road awarded to Triacta Nig. Ltd (N1.01 billion); construction of Ojutu Bridge in Ilobu, Osun State awarded to Halicass Integrated Ltd (N522.2 million); the construction of Ohan-Moro Bridge on Ilorin-Igbeti Road awarded to Bonus Nig. Ltd (N942.6 million); and rehabilitation of Abuja-Kaduna Road awarded to CGC Nig. Ltd (N26.9 billion).
“Others are rehabilitation of Kaduna-Zaria Road in Katsina State awarded to Arab Contractors Nig. Ltd for N14.8 billon; rehabilitation of Zaria-Kano Road in Kaduna/Kano State awarded to Reynold Construction Nig. Ltd (N69.9 billion); and the construction of Burga-Dull-Mbatill-Tadnum-Gpbiya-Badagari-Gwaranga-Sum, Bauchi State awarded to Rahama Civil Works Nig. Ltd (N10.9 billion).
“The construction of Tudun Wuss-Wandi-Wandi-Baraza-Durr-Zumbul-Polchi-Dot-Kwanar Road, Bauchi State awarded to Dalum Construction Nig. at N12.2 billion and the construction of Pankshin-Tapshin-Gambar-Sara-Kai-Gindiri Road in Plateau State awarded to Metropolitan Construction Company Limited at N15.3 billion are also among the contracts slated for award by the ministry.”
CSNAC said it was revealed that in line with the requirement of the Public Procurement Act, 2007, Fashola’s ministry had, in a letter dated November 7, 2016, requested the Bureau to issue it Due Process Certificate of “No Objection” for the award of the 10 contracts and that the ministry had earlier in June advertised the projects in some national newspapers as well as the Federal Tenders Journal edition of Monday May 30- June 10, 2016.
It said: “On July 25, 2016, the pre-qualification documents were opened in the Conference Room of the ministry in the presence of representatives of prospective contractors, non-governmental organisations, the Nigeria Society of Engineers and some member of the public as well as officials of the ministry.
“In line with Part V, Clause 22, Section 4 of the Pubic Procurement Act (PPA) 2007, the Permanent Secretary/Chairman of the Ministerial Tenders Board constituted a Technical Evaluation Committee to evaluate the tenders received from prospective contractors.The contractors successful in the technical evaluation exercise were “provisionally prequalified”, with their documents forwarded to the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), and banks for verification, following which they were subsequently invited to submit completed financial tender documents.
“The ministry then carried out a verification exercise on some of the claims made by bidders in their technical bids. After the verification exercise, the ministry wrote to the BPP to request certificate of no objection for the recommended contractors.
“However, the BPP objected to the award of the contracts citing various violations of the PPA Act, insisting that it would not grant the ministry due process certificate until its concerns were adequately addressed.”
Some of the concerns raised are” “No evidence that feasibility and financial/economic studies were conducted during projects’ preparation.
“Failure to prepare or submit Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the Due Process Review of the projects and failure to submit the technical bids for the companies that participated in the pre-qualification exercise, among others.”
The BPP complained that the above has made the bench-marking and value-for-money checks almost unfeasible and has opened avenues to subject the procurement processes to many frivolous petitions and counter-petitions that could likely delay the immediate commencement and execution of the projects.
CSNAC said it is in view of the unresolved concerns and the fact that failure to comply with specified laws and provisions of the Bureau of Public Procurements may likely be an undertone of some corrupt practices in the procurement process, “that we are requesting that you use your good offices to investigate the above especially against the backdrop of the allegations of inflation of project sums.
“The above investigation by your office is necessary in other to ensure that the current administration’s stance against corruption is not mere lip service and to guarantee that all and every individual or institution involved in corrupt practices to the detriment of the development and progress of our society are brought to book.”

Copyright The Eagle Online.
Permission to use quotations from this article is granted subject to appropriate credit being given to www.theeagleonline.com.ng as the source.

Follow @DEagleOnline


Go to Source

Auto firms scramble to liquidate stocks of BS 111 vehicles

With over 8 lakh vehicles worth up to Rs 20,000 crore hit by the Supreme Court order to ban BS III vehicles from April 1, auto companies are scrambling to liquidate stocks and upgrade besides considering export options to minimise the impact.

According to industry estimates the total value of the impacted vehicles is between Rs 15,000 to Rs 20,000 crore. Around 6.71 lakh two-wheelers, 97,000 commercial vehicles and over 40,000 three wheelers are affected by the ban. “Given the current demand,

“Given the current demand, majority of the vehicles in the pipeline have already been sold. Some more will be sold in the next couple of days where we have customer orders,” Ashok Leyland MD and CEO Vinod K Dasari said in a statement. The little inventory that is left would be exported to other markets where the company has

The little inventory that is left would be exported to other markets where the company has significant presence and which still operate on BS III norms, he added. “Finally, for any other vehicles still leftover, the company confirms that it will be able to easily upgrade them to BS IV at minimal cost,” Dasari said. Dasari, who is also the President of

“Finally, for any other vehicles still leftover, the company confirms that it will be able to easily upgrade them to BS IV at minimal cost,” Dasari said. Dasari, who is also the President of

Dasari, who is also the President of industry body SIAM, said the Supreme Court verdict banning BS III vehicles from April will have to be respected but it is “frustrating” that the existing law allowing sale of these vehicles was ignored.

He said commercial vehicle makers have been producing BS IV units since 2010 but they have been selling BS III for the last seven years because of lack of fuel.

Stating that as per government notification, sales of BS III vehicles were allowed after April 1, he said: “Now suddenly those BS III vehicles are banned. I find it quite frustrating that something like this happens.”

The main issue for the industry has been the availability of BS IV fuel across the country, he added.

On the impact of the verdict, Dasari said: “There will be utter chaos in the next few days for the dealers and the finance companies which have sold BS III.”

Country’s largest two wheeler maker Hero MotoCorp said it carefully planned a proactive move to switch from BS III to BS IV compliant products across all its range well in time and have been producing only BS IV compliant products since one month before the given deadline.

“We have reduced our inventory significantly in the past few months with the aim to minimise our stakeholder losses. However, environmental protection will take precedence over temporary financial benefits,” Hero MotoCorp Chairman , Managing Director and CEO Pawan Munjal said.

Supporting the Supreme Court order, Daimler India Commercial Vehicles Managing Director and CEO Erich Nesselhauf said: “Today’s decision of the Supreme Court reassures us in our belief that industry interests must go together with the interests of the society at large.”

The BS-IV standard will bring much needed improvements in terms of air quality, to the benefit of the people and the environment, he added.

“At BharatBenz, we had made the strategic decision last year to only focus on BS-IV vehicles…consequently, we gradually phased out BS-III in our business system and have made the switch to produce only BS-IV vehicles in March, exactly according to plan,” Nesselhauf said.

Bajaj Auto Managing Director Rajiv Bajaj said: “There are some things on which you can’t put a price. This is for the future of our children. This is a matter of principle.”

Although the notification says “production, not sales from April 1”, but “you have to read what is unwritten”, he said.

Similarly, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Vice-Chairman Vikram Kirloskar said: “We have to go towards meeting global standards of emission and safety, and that is the only way forward.”

Toyota Kirloskar stopped manufacturing of BS III vehicles more than a year ago and all its vehicles currently being sold in India are BS IV compliant.

Two-wheeler maker Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India said: “We respect the honourable Supreme Court’s decision and confirm that all our products comply with BSIV norms.”

Car market leader Maruti Suzuki is least affected by the order and has been making BS IV vehicles since 2010. Hyundai Motor India said it respects the court’s decision and confirmed that all its products complied with BS IV norms.

Commenting on the implications of the order, EY Partner and automotive sector leader Rakesh Batra said: “The Supreme Court decision will result in difficulties for the entire automotive value chain, on top of cost increases to comply with BSIV vehicle production and GST implementation.”

This industry works globally on 20 to 30 days inventory within the distribution channel and this should have considered as part of the transition plan when migrating from BS III to BS IV, he added.

“Unfortunately a last minute decision does not help any of the industry stakeholders or consumers, in the month of March when volumes are higher due to year-end purchases and deals,” Batra said.

Credit rating agency ICRA said that CV segment will be the most impacted on account of sizeable inventory levels and due to potential costs associated with inventory re-call from dealers and upgradation to BS-IV norms.

Go to Source

Automobile firms scramble to liquidate stocks of BS III vehicles

NEW DELHI: With over 8 lakh vehicles worth up to Rs 20,000 crore hit by the Supreme Court order to ban BS III vehicles from April 1, auto companies are scrambling to liquidate stocks and upgrade besides considering export options to minimise the impact.      

According to industry estimates the total value of the impacted vehicles is between Rs 15,000 to Rs 20,000 crore. Around 6.71 lakh two-wheelers, 97,000 commercial vehicles and over 40,000 three wheelers are affected by the ban.      

“Given the current demand, majority of the vehicles in the pipeline have already been sold. Some more will be sold in the next couple of days where we have customer orders,” Ashok Leyland MD and CEO Vinod K Dasari said in a statement.      

The little inventory that is left would be exported to other markets where the company has significant presence and which still operate on BS III norms, he added.      

“Finally, for any other vehicles still leftover, the company confirms that it will be able to easily upgrade them to BS IV at minimal cost,” Dasari said.      

Dasari, who is also the President of industry body SIAM, said the Supreme Court verdict banning BS III vehicles from April will have to be respected but it is “frustrating” that the existing law allowing sale of these vehicles was ignored.      

He said commercial vehicle makers have been producing BS IV units since 2010 but they have been selling BS III for the last seven years because of lack of fuel.      

Stating that as per government notification, sales of BS III vehicles were allowed after April 1, he said: “Now suddenly those BS III vehicles are banned. I find it quite frustrating that something like this happens.”      

The main issue for the industry has been the availability of BS IV fuel across the country, he added.      On the impact of the verdict, Dasari said: “There will be utter chaos in the next few days for the dealers and the finance companies which have sold BS III.”      

Country’s largest two-wheeler maker Hero MotoCorp said it carefully planned a proactive move to switch from BS III to BS IV compliant products across all its range well in time and have been producing only BS IV compliant products since one month before the given deadline.      

“We have reduced our inventory significantly in the past few months with the aim to minimise our stakeholder losses. However, environmental protection will take precedence over temporary financial benefits,” Hero MotoCorp Chairman , Managing Director and CEO Pawan Munjal said.      

Supporting the Supreme Court order, Daimler India Commercial Vehicles Managing Director and CEO Erich Nesselhauf said: “Today’s decision of the Supreme Court reassures us in our belief that industry interests must go together with the interests of the society at large.”      

The BS-IV standard will bring much needed improvements in terms of air quality, to the benefit of the people and the environment, he added.      

“At BharatBenz, we had made the strategic decision last year to only focus on BS-IV vehicles…consequently, we gradually phased out BS-III in our business system and have made the switch to produce only BS-IV vehicles in March, exactly according to plan,” Nesselhauf said.      Bajaj Auto Managing Director Rajiv Bajaj said: “There are some things on which you can’t put a price. This is for the future of our children. This is a matter of principle.”    

Although the notification says “production, not sales from April 1”, but “you have to read what is unwritten”, he said.      

Similarly, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Vice-Chairman Vikram Kirloskar said: “We have to go towards meeting global standards of emission and safety, and that is the only way forward.”      

Toyota Kirloskar stopped manufacturing of BS III vehicles more than a year ago and all its vehicles currently being sold in India are BS IV compliant.      

Two-wheeler maker Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India said: “We respect the honourable Supreme Court’s decision and confirm that all our products comply with BSIV norms.”      

Car market leader Maruti Suzuki is least affected by the order and has been making BS IV vehicles since 2010. Hyundai Motor India said it respects the court’s decision and confirmed that all its products complied with BS IV norms.      

Commenting on the implications of the order, EY Partner and automotive sector leader Rakesh Batra said: “The Supreme Court decision will result in difficulties for the entire automotive value chain, on top of cost increases to comply with BSIV vehicle production and GST implementation.”      

This industry works globally on 20 to 30 days inventory within the distribution channel and this should have considered as part of the transition plan when migrating from BS III to BS IV, he added.      

“Unfortunately a last minute decision does not help any of the industry stakeholders or consumers, in the month of March when volumes are higher due to year-end purchases and deals,” Batra said.      

Credit rating agency ICRA said that CV segment will be the most impacted on account of sizeable inventory levels and due to potential costs associated with inventory re-call from dealers and upgradation to BS-IV norms.

Go to Source

Kroll Investigations and Cyber Expertise Rated Best By National Law Journal Readers

Kroll Investigations and Cyber Expertise Rated Best By National Law Journal Readers

NEW YORK, Mar 29, 2017 (BUSINESS WIRE) —

Kroll (“the Company”), a global leader in risk mitigation,
investigations, compliance, cyber resilience, security, and incident
response solutions, today announced that the recently released “2017
Best of the National Law Journal” report names Kroll as “Best
Litigation Dispute Advisory Services Consultant”, “Best Corporate
Investigations Provider”, and “Best Cyber Security Provider”. This marks
the sixth consecutive year that Kroll has been ranked as the top service
provider or as a finalist in at least two or more categories.

The National Law Journal’s Sixth Annual Best of Reader Choice
Survey awarded top honors in 92 distinct categories. Winners and
finalists were selected following a vote by 4,500 National Law Journal
readers, including private practitioners, judges, corporate general
counsel, government attorneys, and other members of the legal community.

“It is gratifying to receive recognition from the members of the legal
community that Kroll has been serving for decades. Our professionals
have consistently helped counsel and their clients to address complex
and varied challenges, delivering problem-solving and risk mitigation
services in the areas of complex investigations, due diligence, forensic
accounting and data analysis, and cyber services,” said David Fontaine,
Chief Executive Officer of Kroll and its parent, Corporate Risk
Holdings. “These awards reaffirm Kroll’s well-earned reputation for
helping to produce positive client outcomes through a deep knowledge of
human behavior and facility in navigating current and emerging
technologies. I am very proud of the entire global Kroll organization.”

About Kroll:

Kroll is the leading global provider of risk solutions. For more than 40
years, Kroll has helped clients make confident risk management decisions
about people, assets, operations and security through a wide range of
investigations, cyber security, due diligence and compliance, physical
and operational security, and data and information management services.
Headquartered in New York with more than 35 offices in 20 countries,
Kroll has a multidisciplinary team of nearly 1,000 employees and serves
a global clientele of law firms, financial institutions, corporations,
non-profit institutions, government agencies, and individuals. For more
information visit www.kroll.com.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release may contain “forward-looking statements.” These
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements
regarding the Company’s performance and growth, and other non-historical
statements. Forward-looking statements identify prospective information.
Important factors could cause actual results to differ, possibly
materially, from those stated in the forward-looking statements. In some
cases you can identify forward-looking statements by words such as
“anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,”
“plan,” “predict,” “potential,” “should,” “will” and “would” or the
negatives thereof, variations thereof or other similar words. You should
read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss
the Company’s future priorities, goals, strategies, actions to improve
business performance, market growth assumptions and expectations, future
business opportunities, capital expenditures, financing needs, financial
position and other information that is not historical information or
state other “forward-looking” information. Forward-looking statements
should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and
will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by
which, such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking
information is based on information available at the time and/or
management’s good faith belief with respect to future events, and is
subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance
or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are
made. The Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking
statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes
in other factors affecting forward-looking information except to the
extent required by applicable securities laws. If the Company does
update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be
drawn that the Company will make additional updates with respect thereto
or with respect to other forward-looking statements.

http://cts.businesswire.com/ct/CT?id=bwnews&sty=20170329005684r1&sid=cmtx6&distro=nx&lang=en

View source version on businesswire.com: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170329005684/en/

SOURCE: Kroll

Kroll (U.S. Contact) 
Nicole Cueto 
212-833-3481 
or 
Media Contact: 
Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher 
Dan Moore / Jeffrey Kauth 
212-355-4449

Copyright Business Wire 2017

Go to Source