U.S. official: ‘Would be surprised’ if Russia doesn’t face sanctions under new law

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said on Thursday she would be surprised if the United States doesn’t at some point impose sanctions on Russian firms or entities covered by a U.S. sanctions law that went into effect in late January.

The Trump administration faced criticism when the law went into effect and the department issued a list of wealthy Russians but failed to take any punitive action. Nauert told a briefing on Thursday the department has people monitoring transactions worldwide to see if sanctions are merited.

“As you know we don’t forecast sanctions,” she told the briefing, “but I would be very surprised if there weren’t sanctions in the future.”

Reporting by David AlexanderEditing by Eric Walsh

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Go to Source

Pomerantz Law Firm Announces Dismissal of Lawsuit against The Crypto Company – CRCW

Pomerantz Law Firm Announces Dismissal of Lawsuit against The Crypto Company – CRCW – World News Report – EIN News

Trusted News Since 1995

A service for global professionals
·
Friday, February 16, 2018

·
432,375,336
Articles


·
3+ Million Readers

News Monitoring and Press Release Distribution Tools

News Topics

Newsletters

Press Releases

Events & Conferences

RSS Feeds

Other Services

Questions?

Staff leave top law firm amid ‘serious’ sexual allegations

At least two staff members from one of New Zealand’s top law firms have left after allegations of sexually inappropriate behaviour towards young, female law-clerk students.

And Victoria University, which confirmed allegations involving several of its students, said it understood police continued to have an “open file” on the matter.

Russell McVeagh chief executive Gary McDiarmid confirmed last night that the firm had received “serious allegations” about events in Wellington more than two years ago.

It is understood the allegations involved students in the firm’s summer law-clerk programme.

“Where allegations were made, we immediately conducted a full internal investigation at the time and initiated a formal process. Those who were the subject of the allegations left the firm following the investigation,” McDiarmid said.

He said he would not discuss specific details for privacy reasons.

Newsroom.co.nz, which revealed the allegations yesterday, said two incidents happened at Christmas functions and another at the El Horno Bar in Wellington.
At least one complaint was made to police about a man’s behaviour at El Horno.

Police said this morning they could not confirm whether or not certain organisations or individuals were under investigation.

Victoria University Vice Chancellor Grant Guilford understood a young law clerk student who was part of a summer programme made an allegation of sexual assault.

Guilford said he was aware of several other young women who also allegedly experienced sexually inappropriate behaviour at the time.

At the time the university believed it was a police matter so it focused on supporting the young women and ensuring a safe environment for future workplace students.

“Our feeling was that we couldn’t be involved in the complaint because it was a police matter other than supporting our students that had been impacted [and] helping to advocate for them.”

He also said he could not give specific details because of privacy issues.

Advertisement

However, the law firm had taken steps to address the matter and he understood police continued to have open files.

“You can imagine how you feel just being appointed in your first job, all of sudden to find you’re assaulted. Creates a completely new sense of ‘that’s why they wanted to hire me; it wasn’t for my ability or because I was doing well’.”

Guilford said the university had since worked with Russell McVeagh and others to make major changes to the clerkship programme.

“We have worked closely with Russell McVeagh and other firms to ensure that young women or any young person is well-protected.”

This included better induction, help hotlines for those exposed to bad behaviour and reinforced HR policies.

McDiarmid said the firm had “zero tolerance” to bad behaviour.

“[We] will have no hesitation to act if we are alerted to behaviour that contravenes our values, with robust processes in place to investigate and resolve any issues.

“We continue to take all possible steps to create a ‘speak out’ culture and as part of this, have made it clear to our staff that there will be no repercussions for speaking out in any circumstance.”

McDiarmid said Russell McVeagh has always taken employees’ concerns “extremely seriously”.

“We are committed to addressing any issues of harassment at Russell McVeagh, and in our profession generally, by making it known that any such behaviour is totally unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

“In addition, we have been and are working closely with many of the other major law firms and the universities to develop a ‘transition to work’ programme and have appointed an independent person, to provide additional support to our staff and graduates within the profession as they commence their careers from university.”

Guilford said the university had been in contact with the women at the time.

“I think this is a major issue for New Zealand society. It is quite difficult for a young woman in this situation to consider undertaking a complaint with the police and going through the court system. It’s as little as 3 per cent of our sexual assault cases actually do end up going through the police and into the courts.

“I think if anything that comes of this of any good, it’s that we face up to these things in our workplaces and make sure there’s a zero tolerance of it across the country.

“I know from my interactions with the survivors of those incidents how catastrophic this can be for a young person’s confidence. I don’t think that is understood well by our society.”

Go to Source

Top law firm Russell McVeagh embroiled in ‘serious’ sexual allegations involving law students

At least two staff members from one of New Zealand’s top law firms have left after allegations of sexually inappropriate behaviour towards young, female law-clerk students.

And Victoria University, which confirmed allegations involving several of its students, said it understood police continued to have an “open file” on the matter.

Russell McVeagh chief executive Gary McDiarmid confirmed last night that the firm had received “serious allegations” about events in Wellington more than two years ago.

It is understood the allegations involved students in the firm’s summer law-clerk programme.

“Where allegations were made, we immediately conducted a full internal investigation at the time and initiated a formal process. Those who were the subject of the allegations left the firm following the investigation,” McDiarmid said.

He said he would not discuss specific details for privacy reasons.

Newsroom.co.nz, which revealed the allegations yesterday, said two incidents happened at Christmas functions and another at the El Horno Bar in Wellington.
At least one complaint was made to police about a man’s behaviour at El Horno.

Police said this morning they could not confirm whether or not certain organisations or individuals were under investigation.

Victoria University Vice Chancellor Grant Guilford understood a young law clerk student who was part of a summer programme made an allegation of sexual assault.

Guilford said he was aware of several other young women who also allegedly experienced sexually inappropriate behaviour at the time.

At the time the university believed it was a police matter so it focused on supporting the young women and ensuring a safe environment for future workplace students.

“Our feeling was that we couldn’t be involved in the complaint because it was a police matter other than supporting our students that had been impacted [and] helping to advocate for them.”

He also said he could not give specific details because of privacy issues.

Advertisement

However, the law firm had taken steps to address the matter and he understood police continued to have open files.

“You can imagine how you feel just being appointed in your first job, all of sudden to find you’re assaulted. Creates a completely new sense of ‘that’s why they wanted to hire me; it wasn’t for my ability or because I was doing well’.”

Guilford said the university had since worked with Russell McVeagh and others to make major changes to the clerkship programme.

“We have worked closely with Russell McVeagh and other firms to ensure that young women or any young person is well-protected.”

This included better induction, help hotlines for those exposed to bad behaviour and reinforced HR policies.

McDiarmid said the firm had “zero tolerance” to bad behaviour.

“[We] will have no hesitation to act if we are alerted to behaviour that contravenes our values, with robust processes in place to investigate and resolve any issues.

“We continue to take all possible steps to create a ‘speak out’ culture and as part of this, have made it clear to our staff that there will be no repercussions for speaking out in any circumstance.”

McDiarmid said Russell McVeagh has always taken employees’ concerns “extremely seriously”.

“We are committed to addressing any issues of harassment at Russell McVeagh, and in our profession generally, by making it known that any such behaviour is totally unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

“In addition, we have been and are working closely with many of the other major law firms and the universities to develop a ‘transition to work’ programme and have appointed an independent person, to provide additional support to our staff and graduates within the profession as they commence their careers from university.”

Guilford said the university had been in contact with the women at the time.

“I think this is a major issue for New Zealand society. It is quite difficult for a young woman in this situation to consider undertaking a complaint with the police and going through the court system. It’s as little as 3 per cent of our sexual assault cases actually do end up going through the police and into the courts.

“I think if anything that comes of this of any good, it’s that we face up to these things in our workplaces and make sure there’s a zero tolerance of it across the country.

“I know from my interactions with the survivors of those incidents how catastrophic this can be for a young person’s confidence. I don’t think that is understood well by our society.”

Go to Source

Students in law clerk programme report inappropriate sexual behaviour

Victoria University of Wellington vice-chancellor professor Grant Guilford said they became aware of complaints over the ...

ROSS GIBLIN/STUFF

Victoria University of Wellington vice-chancellor professor Grant Guilford said they became aware of complaints over the 2015/16 summer, in October 2016.

Staff have left a leading Wellington law firm amid allegations of inappropriate sexual behaviour from students in a summer law clerk programme. 

Victoria University of Wellington vice-chancellor professor Grant Guilford said in October 2016 they received complaints about the behaviour of staff at law firm Russell McVeagh during the 2015-16 summer. 

“We are extremely disappointed that the incidents occurred.” 

Russell McVeagh's Wellington firm has come under the public eye for reports of their summer interns in a clerk programme ...

Russell McVeagh’s Wellington firm has come under the public eye for reports of their summer interns in a clerk programme reporting inappropriate sexual behaviour.

The matter was referred to the Police, he said.

READ MORE:
* Where the dangers in the #MeToo movement lie
* Home detention sentence for man who sexually abused daughter
* US gymnastics sexual abuse case shows the need for vigilance

 

“Victoria was not involved in the resolution of the complaints as we ascertained this was a matter being investigated by the Police.”

Russell McVeagh chief executive Gary McDiarmid said more than two years ago they received serious allegations related to incidents in Wellington. 

“We immediately conducted a full internal investigation at the time and initiated a formal process.”

Those who were the subject of allegations left the firm after the investigation, he said.

“Out of respect for the privacy of the women involved, we have no further details to share.” 

Ad Feedback

As a responsible employer, Russell McVeagh took employees’ concerns “extremely seriously”.

Russell McVeagh were committed to ensuring their workplace was a supportive and safe environment for all staff, and their safety and wellbeing was their priority, McDiarmid said.

They had a “zero tolerance” for bad behaviour. 

“We continue to take all possible steps to create a ‘speak out’ culture and as part of this, have made it clear to our staff that there will be no repercussions for speaking out in any circumstance.”  

Russell McVeagh were committed to addressing issues of harassment, and in the law profession generally, he said.

“Any such behaviour is totally unacceptable and will not be tolerated.”

“We have been asked by the women affected to respect their privacy, and therefore, will not be commenting further.”

The firm had been working with other major law firms and universities to develop a “transition to work” programme. 

An independent person had been appointed to provide additional support to staff and graduates as they started their law careers, he said. 

Russell McVeagh’s website describes the programme as an opportunity for students to work in “New Zealand’s top law firm” alongside some of the best solicitors in the country.

Students could “meet some great people and have all the perks of working at a top tier firm”, the website says. 

“Our aim is for each of our summer clerks to have a great summer, get to know our firm, our people and our values and ultimately, to join us as a graduate once they finish university.” 

Guilford said the university stepped in to ensure the safety of summer clerks working in the firm in the future, but was not involved in the resolution of the complaints. 

“We are extremely cautious about not doing anything to compromise this investigation.

“We were, however, involved in supporting our students and advocating for them to protect their rights in the process, including their right to privacy.” 

The reports from the students were discussed by the New Zealand vice-chancellors committee, and the New Zealand Law Deans, he said. 

“[They] discussed a focus on ensuring the safety of future summer clerks working at Russell McVeagh.”

Student safety was “of paramount importance” to the university, he said. 

“Victoria has a clear pathway for reporting sexual violence and harassment, whether it happens on campus or off campus.

“We provide information about consent on our website and when a disclosure is made, we provide strong support through our health and counselling services and other student support services.” 

Guilford said Russell McVeagh’s senior staff showed genuine concern for the students involved. 

“We did witness, amongst senior staff at Russell McVeagh, a determination to ensure the safety of future summer clerks at their own workplace and in the wider legal profession.” 

Police have been approached for comment.


 – Stuff

Go to Source

Leaders in Law Finalists – ATTORNEY AWARDS: LITIGATION ATTORNEYS

Left to Right: Brian Horne, Rickey Ivie, Randye B. Soref, Alex Weingarten

Left to Right: Brian Horne, Rickey Ivie, Randye B. Soref, Alex Weingarten

LITIGATION ATTORNEYS

BRIAN HORNE: Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP – Partner

Brian Horne is a Knobbe Martens partner in the Los Angeles office. He has handled cases involving patent, trademark, trade dress, copyright, trade secret, unfair competition and breach of contract matters. Horne has litigated cases in United States District Courts nationwide, as well as at the Federal Circuit and International Trade Commission. He has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in many technological areas, including pharmaceuticals, mechanical, medical and electronic devices.

Among Horne’s representative matters include Masimo Corp. v. Philips Electronics North America Corp. in which he represented medical-device maker Masimo and achieved a complete victory in obtaining a jury verdict of over $466 million for lost-profits damages against Philips for infringing two Masimo patents. The jury also rejected Philips’ infringement claims seeking $169 million.

RICKEY IVIE: Ivie, McNeill & Wyatt PC – Partner

Rickey Ivie is the president and founding partner of Ivie, McNeill & Wyatt, the largest black owned law firm in the nation and one of Southern California’s premier full-service law firms, representing a broad range of businesses, public entities and individuals in a vast array of litigation matters and transactions. In his four decades of litigation experience, Ivie has tried more than 100 jury trials, including precedent-setting cases that have changed the practice of law and improved the lives of millions of people.

Over the span of his career, Ivie has handled a range of significant matters related to personal injury, wrongful death, civil rights violations, contract disputes, trademark, copyright and corporate and commercial litigation. His clients range from individuals and government entities to well-known corporations including restaurants, entertainment companies and commercial construction businesses. Since becoming a founding partner in 1980, Ivi has solidified Ivie, growing the firm significantly in the last 30 years.

RANDYE B. SOREF: Polsinelli LLP – Principal

Soref is a nationally recognized attorney who focuses her practice on bankruptcy, creditors’ rights, corporate workouts, reorganizations and commercial litigation. She represents all classes of creditors in bankruptcy proceedings and out of court restructurings, including Assignments for the Benefit of Creditors throughout the United States.

Soref routinely represents creditors, committees, sellers, and buyers and advises on bankruptcy strategy, counseling, reorganization, enforcement of debt instruments and litigation. Soref has been lead attorney in nationally known distressed retail and apparel companies, including e-commerce companies. She has also been the lead attorney in numerous distressed healthcare matters involving large nationally based hospitals, health plans, health care providers, and skilled nursing facilities, as well as patient care ombudsmen appointed by the U.S. Trustee who Soref counsels regarding privacy related issues. Soref also counsels institutional clients on credit documentation, collection efforts and other credit matters.

ALEX M. WEINGARTEN: Venable LLP – Partner

Alex Weingarten represents clients in all facets of entertainment, business and probate litigation. He does not merely litigate cases and settle; he has a strong track record of picking juries and winning verdicts. Clients look to Weingarten to handle high-profile cases, protect their integrity during the very public litigation process, provide a fresh approach, and suggest novel and overlooked strategies. He is aggressive about optimizing results and prides himself on finding the most direct route to victory. Sometimes that means finding a creative solution around a difficult problem; sometimes it means bowling through it.

Among his high-profile cases was representing hip-hop superstar Snoop Dogg in a lawsuit against beer maker Pabst Brewing, claiming the firm owes Snoop Dogg money from the sale of the company and its beer line. Weingarten won every motion filed by either side in the case – including defeating the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and another motion to have the case transferred to Illinois.

Return to Index

Go to Source

Man tapped to head State Law Office has rich stint at Judiciary

By SAM KIPLAGAT
More by this Author

Justice Paul Kihara Kariuki, the man President Uhuru Kenyatta has tapped to head the State Law Office and Department of Justice, was appointed a Judge of the High Court in October 2003 by President Mwai Kibaki.

The judge, known for carrying his ink and fountain pen to the courtroom, occasionally cracks jokes during court sessions.

This is especially when lawyers tire litigants with their legalese.

He would also act as the master of ceremonies when the Judiciary holds big occasions, because of his oratory skills.

STAREHE PETITION

Among the cases he heard and concluded during his tenure as a Judge of the High Court is an election petition filed by Maina Kamanda against Bishop Margaret Wanjiru for the Starehe seat.

He nullified the election and ordered a by-election.

Other than his stint at Milimani Commercial Courts, Justice Kariuki also served as a Judge in Machakos.

During his stint at the High Court, he was made the Director of the Judicial Training Institute by Chief Justice Willy Mutunga.

He was succeeded in the position by High Court Judge Prof Joel Ngugi.

COURT OF APPEAL

In 2012, he was elevated to the Court of Appeal and in February 22, 2013, Justice Kariuki was elected the President of the Court, beating his sole opponent, Justice David Maraga, after two rounds of voting.

And, although he beat Justice Maraga to the seat, it was the latter who would have the last laugh, after becoming the President of the Supreme Court and the second Chief Justice in the new constitutional dispensation.

This is because, for many years, speculation was rife that Justice Kariuki would succeed retiring Chief Justice Evan Gicheru.

Before his appointment as a judge, Justice Kariuki served as Chancellor of the Anglican Church of Kenya. He also served as the Director of the Kenya School of Law.

In September 2013, judges of the Court of Appeal defied him after he directed them to move to Elgon Place within a week.

The judges declined to move in, arguing that the telecommunications equipment around the building was emitting radioactive materials harmful to their health.

PIONEER LAW FIRMS

Justice Kihara is a former partner in one of the country’s pioneer law firms, Hamilton Harrison & Mathews.

He later moved to Ndung’u Njoroge and Kwach before being appointed a Judge of the High Court.

At the Court of Appeal he, together with William Ouko, Patrick Kiage, Gatembu Kairu and Agnes Murgor, overturned a decision of the High Court that had thrown out former Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission chairman Mumo Matemu on integrity issues.

The bench set aside the whole of the decision saying that the case did not provide adequate particulars of the claims relating to the alleged violations of the Constitution and the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission Act, 2011.

“The High Court misapplied the rationality test in adopting a standard of review antithetic to the doctrine of separation of powers,” the court said.

The Judges agreed that the High Court was entitled to conduct a review of appointments to State or Public Office to determine the procedural soundness as well as the appointment decision itself, to determine if it meets the constitutional threshold.

Turkey exercises rights legally derived from int’l marine law in Eastern Mediterranean

Hydrocarbon sources in the Eastern Mediterranean have ignited diplomatic spats between Turkey and the EU, Greece and Greek Cyprus after Turkey sent a warship to the region on Friday, but Turkey continues to remain within the boundaries of international maritime law

Turkey’s blockade of Italian energy firm ENI’s rigging operations in the Eastern Mediterranean to explore hydrocarbon resources has echoed in the Greek Cypriot administration, Greece and the European Union. The escalating diplomatic lambasts, however, blur the issue of legality while ignoring the sovereign rights of Turkey and Turkish Cyprus on the natural resources in the Eastern Mediterranean. Energy and Natural Resources Minister Berat Albayrak emphasized that Turkey will not allow the spread of ignorance toward and violations of Turkish Cyprus’s rights and will exercise its legal rights to the fullest extent.

Over the recent days, the hydrocarbon resources in Eastern Mediterranean have again ignited dispute between the Greek Cypriot administration, Greece, the European Union and Turkey. Following the Italian energy firm ENI’s rigging operations after the company announced discovery of natural resources with its French partner Total in the area which is called the 6th Block in the so-called exclusive economic zone unilaterally declared by the Greek Cypriot administration. Seeing the matter as a violation of rights of Turkish Cypriots, Turkey sent its warships to the area blocking the Italian ENI to start searching for gas.

Speaking at a ceremony in Ankara, Albayrak highlighted Turkey’s robust determination to continue protecting its sovereign rights and the rights of Turkish Cypriot people in the eastern Mediterranean region. “Turkey will not allow any parties to neglect or ignore Turkish Cyprus and its citizens and will exercise its rights bestowed by internationally acknowledged laws.” Albayrak also stressed that Turkey will conduct efficient energy diplomacy and politics in the region.

National Union Party Member of Parliament Sunat Atun, former economy and energy minister, told Daily Sabah that Turkey is protecting its rights derived from international maritime law by sending warships to the region. According to the international maritime law, he said national territories have a continental shelf up to 200 miles while the islands have territorial waters extending up to 14 miles. “The so-called 6th Block, within this territory, falls within the limits of Turkey’s 200-mile continental shelf,” he underscored.

“By unilaterally declaring an exclusive economic zone and granting licenses to international energy firms without due consideration of the rights of the Republic of Turkey and Turkish Cypriots, the Greek Cypriot administration is trying to usurp Turkey’s territorial rights,” Atun added.

He further remarked that the economic benefits the Greek Cypriot will gain from this escalation is no less than a political advantage. “By pitting Turkey against the EU and Greece, Atun said, the Greek Cypriot administration also aims to create a political advantage in the process of peace negotiations for the ethnically-split island.”

Speaking at the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) parliamentary group meeting, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan criticized Greece on the issues of the unilateral offshore hydrocarbons search by the Greek Cypriot administration. President Erdoğan stressed that Turkey closely follows the interventions in the territorial waters of the island, casting a warning against the international community.

Erdoğan addressed the international energy companies that operate on the offshore island and emphatically stressed that Turkey does not differentiate the Cyprus issue from Afrin; it attaches the equal importance. So, the illegal interventions do not go unnoticed on Turkey’s agenda, he said.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry released a statement earlier this week saying that the Greek Cypriot Administration is jeopardizing the security and stability of the Eastern Mediterranean. “The Greek Cypriot side is responsible for any consequences that possibly ensue from pursuing unilateral hydrocarbons operations without giving up acting as the island’s sole proprietor and makes efforts to ensure a fair, lasting and comprehensive solution in Cyprus,” the statement said.

The Greek Foreign Ministry made a statement earlier yesterday claiming that Turkey is violating international law in the Eastern Mediterranean. “We urge Turkey to refrain from further unlawful activities and comply with its commitments as they emanate from international law,” stressed the statement.

About this issue, the leader of the Greek Cypriot administration, Nikos Anastasiades, made a phone call to Donald Tusk, head of the European Council, about Turkey’s reaction to the unilateral hydrocarbons search by the Greek Cypriot administration. Tusk called on Turkey to avoid threats or actions against any EU member and instead commit to good neighborly relations, peaceful dispute settlement and respect for territorial sovereignty.

Touching on the issue, Deputy Prime Minister Hakan Çavuşoğlu answered questions about the recent Greece tensions on TV Monday night, saying that Greece can benefit from keeping good relations with Turkey. “Turkey is not a threat to Greece. Turkey has been conducting a policy that tries to maintain good relations with neighbors and it does not intervene in other countries’ territorial integrity, let alone tread over their border security,” he said.

ENI and Total have made a promising gas discovery in the Eastern Mediterranean that confirms that the Zohr-like play where ENI found the biggest gas deposit in the Mediterranean offshore Egypt extends into the offshore territorial waters of the island, which the Greek Cypriot administration supposedly calls the Exclusive Economic Zone.

The Saipem 12000 rig was stopped Friday by Turkish military ships and told not to continue “because there would be military activities in the destination area,” an ENI spokesperson said. “The vessel has prudently executed the orders and will remain in position pending a development in the situation.”

Tensions escalating with an exchange of warnings and lambast emphasize the urgency of the matter to institute a resolution on the island split between Turks in the north and Greeks in the south.

Meanwhile, Turkey’s first drillship, the Deepsea Metro 2, arrived to the country by the end of December, according to Monday’s shipping data, with exploratory offshore drilling in the Mediterranean to begin in early 2018.

Political uncertainty must be resolved for fair share of resources

The politically unresolved situation in the ethnically-split island of Cyprus escalates tension as the discoveries of natural gas resources announced by international energy firms that are one-sidedly granted exploration and rigging license without consideration of the sovereign rights of the Turkish inhabitants of the island. Therefore, the legal status of the Turkish Cypriot administration and the offshore territorial waters must be resolved with the support of the international community.

“The ongoing dispute between Cyprus and Turkey is heating up, as Turkish navy forces are interfering, some even say threatening, the offshore exploration efforts,” Dr. Cyril Widdershoven, founder and director of the Dutch-based Integrated Risk Consultancy firm Verocy told.

Highlighting the importance and urgency to institute a political resolution, he said, “NATO is also able to play a role here, as both Cyprus and Turkey are NATO members, with even British forces still in Cyprus. This should be solved or, without any doubt, the legal position of the offshore exploration and drilling should be made clear,” reminding that the international community does not support the Turkish Cypriot issue.

Go to Source