Boom in convenience seen as firms gear up for Olympic profits

Japanese companies are accelerating preparations to seize Olympic business opportunities to ensure money will keep rolling in after the quadrennial sporting spectacle ends in 2020.

“The mission for the business community is to realize the expected economic effects,” said Sadayuki Sakakibara, chairman of the Japan Business Federation (Keidanren), the nation’s largest business lobby.

Many of the businesses are focusing on new services that can increase convenience.

In the telecommunications industry, for example, testing is underway to showcase a fifth-generation wireless technology dubbed 5G that boasts higher speed and data transmission capacity.

The 5G Wi-Fi advance is expected to be the main technology for distributing high-definition broadcasts and communications services in every aspect of life, including when traveling, industry sources said.

In the lodging industry, supply and demand for rooms is expected to get even tighter for the 2020 Games. This has prompted an increasing number of companies to jump into the minpaku (private lodging) sector, Japan’s version of the room rental services provided by websites like Airbnb.

After the Diet enacted a law on minpaku regulations in June, cybermall Rakuten Inc. announced last month that it would launch minpaku operations as early as January.

“We want to provide innovative services designed to connect people aiming to offer accommodation facilities with those hoping to utilize them,” a Rakuten official said.

Apartment chain Leopalace21 Corp. is also considering a minpaku project.

But the hotel industry is looking to capitalize as well.

Last year, Prince Hotels Inc. rebuilt the venerable Grand Prince Hotel Akasaka, formerly known as the Akasaka Prince, and plans to renovate eight additional Tokyo properties by 2020. In fiscal 2019, it plans to open a more reasonably chain under the Prince Smart Inn brand, charging ¥10,000 per night.

In the transportation industry, meanwhile, the number of van taxis is expected to jump as the Tokyo Hire-Taxi Association moves to replace 10,000 of its roughly 30,000 standard cabs in Tokyo with vehicles that can accommodate groups.

The railways are also boosting efforts by improving barrier-free access and locker services.

Last year, Tokyo Metro Co. began offering temporary storage services for big suitcases that won’t fit in the subway stations’ coin-operated lockers. Given the strong demand, Tokyo Metro is now considering making it a permanent service, an official said.

In the booming realm of big data, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp. group plans to collect and analyze reams of data on foreign visitors, including information on how they move around the city, for “wider use.”

More izakaya (traditional pubs) are meanwhile expected to introduce new smartphone-based payment services by the time the Olympics start.

Go to Source

FIRS hammers firms over N2b tax default

The Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) at the weekend continued its crackdown on tax-defaulting companies in Abuja, The Nation was reliably informed.

The Nation gathered that the FIRS enforcement team, led by Zubairu Usman, sealed the offices of Dayak Nigeria Limited located at Idu Industrial Layout in Area One part of the city. The company has a Value Added Tax liability of N41,535,829.47 owed between 2013 and 2016.

However, R.T Communications, with a tax liability of N106,408,475.00, could not be located due to its use of a fake address.

Ceezali Limited located at Thaba Tseka Street, thought to owe N14,603,941.00, presented evidence of payment and was not sealed.

Earlier in the week, the FIRS shut Ace Products and Services located at Limited 20, Sanni Ashimu Close, Ologun Bus stop, Awoyaya, Lagos over a tax debt of N157.562 million.

On Tuesday, the team sealed off Finchglow Travels Agency at 25 Ademola Street, Ikoyi, Lagos, over a tax debt of N30.553 million. Other firms sealed include Westcom Technologies at 18 A,Onikepo Akande Street, Lekki Phase 1, Lagos, over a tax debt of N25.978 million and Globasure Technologies Limited at Plot 10B2, Lekki Phase 1, Lagos which owed a tax debt of N34.572 million.

On Monday, four companies in Lagos and Port Harcourt were shut over their failure to meet their tax obligations totalling N630 million.

The affected firms comprised Charcoal and Spices Restaurant Limited, GRA, Port Harcourt, and Cioscon Nigerian Limited at 14 Aba Road, Port Harcourt.

The leader of the FIRS enforcement team, Mrs. Anita Erinne, sealed both companies after showing a warrant of distraint to officials of the company.

Charcoal and Spices Restaurant Limited owes N12,388,979.50 tax debt while Cioscon Nigerian Ltd has a tax liability amounting to N479,203,464.43 from 2014 to 2016 which the firm has failed to remit.

Erinne told the defaulting firms that the companies’ premises will be unsealed when they clear their outstanding tax bills.

She warned the workers not to unseal or tamper with the FIRS seal until the debts are cleared, stating that any attempt to remove the seals will be a contravention of the law.

Erinne, however, noted that the firms have been officially notified of their indebtedness to FIRS, stating that all the companies’ taxes should be paid before their premises could be unsealed.

In Lagos, the enforcement team of the FIRS sealed Joza Global Service situated at 18, Ribadu Road, Ikoyi, Lagos over a tax debt of over N30.6 million. The FIRS team also sealed-off Spog Petrochemicals Limited situated at 50d, Glover Road, Ikoyi, Lagos over a tax debt of N105.5 million.


Tags:

Go to Source

drags 7 firms to NCLT for insolvency

Indian Bank has filed cases at the National Company Law Tribunal in seven bad loan cases involving an amount of Rs 1,200 crore, under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
Indian Bank has filed cases at the National Company Law Tribunal in seven bad loan cases involving an amount of Rs 1,200 crore, under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

Indian Bank is the sole lender in all cases. The bank made a provision of Rs 130 crore in the first quarter of the current financial year and it planned to make a provision of Rs 365 crore for the whole year for these accounts, Kishor Kharat, MD and CEO, said to a leading news agency.

Indian Bank offers deposits, loans and services. The bank’s segments include Treasury, Corporate/Wholesale Banking, Retail Banking and Other Banking Operations.

The company offers products under various categories, including agriculture, corporates, personal/individual, business, professional self-employed etc.

(c) 2017India Infoline Ltd. All rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info)., source Middle East & North African Newspapers


Go to Source

Ministers ‘undermined law’ over war crimes claims

Harriet Harman demands Ministry of Justice publish emails that may reveal it pressured law watchdog to act against Iraqi abuse lawyers

Harriet Harman says the government exchanged ‘wholly inappropriate’ emails with the Solicitors Regulation Authority.



Harriet Harman says the government exchanged ‘wholly inappropriate’ emails with the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Photograph: Natasha Quarmby/REX/Shutterstock

Ministers ‘undermined law’ over Iraq war crimes allegations

Harriet Harman demands Ministry of Justice publish emails that may reveal it pressured law watchdog to act against Iraqi abuse lawyers

The government has been accused of undermining the rule of law by putting pressure on an independent regulator in its action against a legal firm pursuing claims of human rights abuses involving British troops in Iraq.

The former deputy leader of the Labour party, Harriet Harman, has called for the release of any emails that would reveal whether the ministries of justice and defence attempted to influence the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to act against Leigh Day. The human rights firm has been involved in many high-profile cases against British soldiers and has referred a number of them to the controversial Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT), now being wound up.

Earlier this year, the firm, two of its senior partners, Martyn Day and Sapna Malik, and a junior lawyer, were cleared by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal of any wrongdoing over claims they had made against British troops. The MoD said it was disappointed with the verdict which, if it had gone the other way, could have been fatal for the firm.

Now in an extraordinary intervention, Harman has written to the attorney general, Jeremy Wright, claiming that “the government’s pressure on the Solicitors Regulation Authority to take disciplinary action against Martyn Day and Sapna Malik of Leigh Day was an action which undermined the rule of law”.

The SRA’s case against Leigh Day was launched following the Al-Sweady inquiry into claims that British soldiers tortured and murdered Iraqi detainees following the battle of Danny Boy in 2004. It concluded that the allegations were “wholly without foundation” although it did find that nine Iraqi detainees had been mistreated.

Phil Shiner from Public Interest Lawyers, who represented a number of the detainees, was found guilty of 22 charges of misconduct and struck off.

The tribunal hearing the case against Leigh Day was told that 276 pieces of correspondence were exchanged between the MoD and the SRA. In several, defence ministers urged civil servants to contact the SRA to seek updates on the firms’ prosecutions.

Phil Shiner, solicitor for several Iraqi civilians, was found guilty of 22 charges of misconduct and was struck off.

Phil Shiner, solicitor for several Iraqi civilians, was found guilty of 22 charges of misconduct and was struck off. Photograph: Martin Argles for the Guardian

Senior officials at the authority replied, and its chief executive, Paul Philip, wrote directly to the defence secretary, Sir Michael Fallon, on at least one occasion. In several emails, SRA employees explained to MoD officials that they were unhappy with the way legal services were being regulated. Dr Ben Sanders, assistant head of responsibilities for public law and historic investigations at the MoD, responded to one: “I am sure ministers here will wish to be supportive.”

The counsel for Leigh Day, Patricia Robertson, suggested to Sanders that the correspondence showed a clear relationship between the SRA and the MoD. Robertson said: “Taking all of that material as a whole what we find here is the SRA using these disciplinary proceedings as a platform for lobbying the government for regulatory reform and also enlisting support from the MoD in that objective. That’s what we see in those exchanges isn’t it?”

Sanders replied: “Yes, I would say that seems a fair characterisation.”

The tribunal ruled that the authority must disclose all its correspondence with the MoD, MoJ, IHAT and the House of Commons defence sub-committee to the relevant parties. But it has not been made public.

Harman has asked the attorney general to publish all the correspondence including any alleged MoJ/SRA emails, which she claims “were wholly inappropriate and designed and perceived to subject the SRA to pressure”.

Before the tribunal, Leigh Day was subjected to fierce criticism in parliament. Fallon said that “the Al-Sweady inquiry was a completely unacceptable attempt to abuse our legal system to falsely impugn our armed forces”.

And David Cameron, then prime minister, declared that “Leigh Day has questions to answer, not least because it was deeply involved in the Al-Sweady inquiry”.

“Having your own government attacking you for doing your job as a lawyer crosses an important line and is something which has the potential for severe consequences for society,” Martyn Day told the Observer this weekend.

“We fully expect the Ministry of Defence to defend claims against it robustly, but there is a line to be drawn when it moves away from the claims and denigrates, in parliament, the lawyers who have been instructed to bring those claims. It would be a very sad day if British lawyers became too scared to take on the UK government, on behalf of individuals in this country and overseas, over issues which are essential to basic human rights.”

In her letter to Wright, Harman said: “It is quite wrong for the government to seek to dictate to the SRA who they should be taking action against. It is invidious for the government to denounce solicitors who are representing claimants who believe that their rights have been violated by the government.”

A MoJ spokesman said: “We fully respect the important and independent role the SRA plays in upholding standards in the legal profession. We are aware of the letter and are investigating further.

“However, early investigations have uncovered no evidence to support these claims.”

Go to Source

Ministers ‘undermined law’ over Iraq war crimes allegations

Harriet Harman demands Ministry of Justice publish emails that may reveal it pressured law watchdog to act against Iraqi abuse lawyers

Harriet Harman says the government exchanged ‘wholly inappropriate’ emails with the Solicitors Regulation Authority.



Harriet Harman says the government exchanged ‘wholly inappropriate’ emails with the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Photograph: Natasha Quarmby/REX/Shutterstock

Ministers ‘undermined law’ over Iraq war crimes allegations

Harriet Harman demands Ministry of Justice publish emails that may reveal it pressured law watchdog to act against Iraqi abuse lawyers

The government has been accused of undermining the rule of law by putting pressure on an independent regulator in its action against a legal firm pursuing claims of human rights abuses involving British troops in Iraq.

The former deputy leader of the Labour party, Harriet Harman, has called for the release of any emails that would reveal whether the ministries of justice and defence attempted to influence the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to act against Leigh Day. The human rights firm has been involved in many high-profile cases against British soldiers and has referred a number of them to the controversial Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT), now being wound up.

Earlier this year, the firm, two of its senior partners, Martyn Day and Sapna Malik, and a junior lawyer, were cleared by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal of any wrongdoing over claims they had made against British troops. The MoD said it was disappointed with the verdict which, if it had gone the other way, could have been fatal for the firm.

Now in an extraordinary intervention, Harman has written to the attorney general, Jeremy Wright, claiming that “the government’s pressure on the Solicitors Regulation Authority to take disciplinary action against Martyn Day and Sapna Malik of Leigh Day was an action which undermined the rule of law”.

The SRA’s case against Leigh Day was launched following the Al-Sweady inquiry into claims that British soldiers tortured and murdered Iraqi detainees following the battle of Danny Boy in 2004. It concluded that the allegations were “wholly without foundation” although it did find that nine Iraqi detainees had been mistreated.

Phil Shiner from Public Interest Lawyers, who represented a number of the detainees, was found guilty of 22 charges of misconduct and struck off.

The tribunal hearing the case against Leigh Day was told that 276 pieces of correspondence were exchanged between the MoD and the SRA. In several, defence ministers urged civil servants to contact the SRA to seek updates on the firms’ prosecutions.

Phil Shiner, solicitor for several Iraqi civilians, was found guilty of 22 charges of misconduct and was struck off.

Phil Shiner, solicitor for several Iraqi civilians, was found guilty of 22 charges of misconduct and was struck off. Photograph: Martin Argles for the Guardian

Senior officials at the authority replied, and its chief executive, Paul Philip, wrote directly to the defence secretary, Sir Michael Fallon, on at least one occasion. In several emails, SRA employees explained to MoD officials that they were unhappy with the way legal services were being regulated. Dr Ben Sanders, assistant head of responsibilities for public law and historic investigations at the MoD, responded to one: “I am sure ministers here will wish to be supportive.”

The counsel for Leigh Day, Patricia Robertson, suggested to Sanders that the correspondence showed a clear relationship between the SRA and the MoD. Robertson said: “Taking all of that material as a whole what we find here is the SRA using these disciplinary proceedings as a platform for lobbying the government for regulatory reform and also enlisting support from the MoD in that objective. That’s what we see in those exchanges isn’t it?”

Sanders replied: “Yes, I would say that seems a fair characterisation.”

The tribunal ruled that the authority must disclose all its correspondence with the MoD, MoJ, IHAT and the House of Commons defence sub-committee to the relevant parties. But it has not been made public.

Harman has asked the attorney general to publish all the correspondence including any alleged MoJ/SRA emails, which she claims “were wholly inappropriate and designed and perceived to subject the SRA to pressure”.

Before the tribunal, Leigh Day was subjected to fierce criticism in parliament. Fallon said that “the Al-Sweady inquiry was a completely unacceptable attempt to abuse our legal system to falsely impugn our armed forces”.

And David Cameron, then prime minister, declared that “Leigh Day has questions to answer, not least because it was deeply involved in the Al-Sweady inquiry”.

“Having your own government attacking you for doing your job as a lawyer crosses an important line and is something which has the potential for severe consequences for society,” Martyn Day told the Observer this weekend.

“We fully expect the Ministry of Defence to defend claims against it robustly, but there is a line to be drawn when it moves away from the claims and denigrates, in parliament, the lawyers who have been instructed to bring those claims. It would be a very sad day if British lawyers became too scared to take on the UK government, on behalf of individuals in this country and overseas, over issues which are essential to basic human rights.”

In her letter to Wright, Harman said: “It is quite wrong for the government to seek to dictate to the SRA who they should be taking action against. It is invidious for the government to denounce solicitors who are representing claimants who believe that their rights have been violated by the government.”

A MoJ spokesman said: “We fully respect the important and independent role the SRA plays in upholding standards in the legal profession. We are aware of the letter and are investigating further.

“However, early investigations have uncovered no evidence to support these claims.”

Go to Source

FIRS seals more firms over tax default

The Federal Inland Revenue Service on Friday continued its crackdown on tax-defaulting companies in Abuja.

The FIRS enforcement team, led by Zubairu Usman, sealed the offices of Dayak Nigeria Limited located at Idu Industrial Layout in Area One part of the city.

The company has a Value Added Tax liability of N41,535,829.47 owed between 2013 and 2016.

However, R.T. Communications, with a tax liability of N106,408,475.00, could not be located due its use of a fake address.

Ceezali Limited, located at Thaba Tseka Street, thought to owe N14,603,941.00, presented evidence of payment and was not sealed.

Earlier in the week, the FIRS shut Ace Products and Services located at Limited 20, Sanni Ashimu Close, Ologun Bus stop, Awoyaya, Lagos, over a tax debt of N157.562 million.

On Tuesday, the team sealed off Finchglow Travels Agency at 25, Ademola Street, Ikoyi, Lagos, over a tax debt of N30.553 million.

Other firms sealed included Westcom Technologies at 18 A, Onikepo Akande Street, Lekki Phase 1, Lagos, over a tax debt of N25.978 million, and Globasure Technologies Limited at Plot 10B2, Lekki Phase 1, Lagos, which owed tax of N34.572 million.

On Monday, four companies in Lagos and Port Harcourt, Rivers State were shut over their failure to meet their tax obligations totalling N630 million.

The affected firms comprised Charcoal and Spices Restaurant Limited, GRA, Port Harcourt, and Cioscon Nigerian Limited at 14, Aba Road, Port Harcourt.

The leader of the FIRS enforcement team,  Anita Erinne, sealed both companies after showing a warrant of distraint to officials of the company.

Charcoal and Spices Restaurant Limited owes N12,388,979.50 tax debt, while Cioscon Nigerian Limited has a tax liability amounting to N479,203,464.43 from 2014 to 2016, which the firm has failed to remit.

Erinne told the defaulting firms that the companies’ premises will be unsealed when they clear their outstanding tax bills.

She warned the workers not to unseal or tamper with the FIRS seal until the debts are cleared, stating that any attempt to remove the seals will be a contravention of the law.

Erinne noted that the firms have been officially notified of their indebtedness to FIRS, stating that all the companies’ taxes should be paid before their premises could be unsealed.

In Lagos, the enforcement team of the FIRS sealed Joza Global Service situated at 18, Ribadu Road, Ikoyi, Lagos over a tax debt of over N30.6 million.

The FIRS team also sealed-off Spog Petrochemicals Limited situated at 50d, Glover Road, Ikoyi, Lagos over a tax debt of N105.5 million.

Advertisements

Go to Source

Two top law firms to defend Sudhir

KAMPALA- Property mogul Sudhir Ruparelia has hired two top law firms to defend him in the Shs397 billion fraud case which Bank of Uganda brought against him in the High Court.
The two law firms Kampala Associated Advocates and J.N. Kirkland & Associates received the court summons on Wednesday.

This ends several days of speculation about which lawyers would defend Kampala’s and probably Uganda’s most propertied man. The Chambers and Partners, a global ranking company for law firms, ranks Kampala Associated Advocates as Band 2 in the General Business Category.
Mr Ruparelia was served with the court summons by A.F. Mpanga Advocates, one of the law firms representing Bank of Uganda in the case, contrary to earlier claims that the businessman had already received the court’s notice.
About a week ago, the High Court’s Commercial Division issued summons to Mr Ruparelia to file his defence against the case within 15 days failure of which judgment would be passed in his absentia.
The 15 days start from the date the defendant (accused) receives the court summons.

This implies Mr Ruparelia’s requirement to file his defence started on Wednesday when his lead law firm Kampala Associated Advocates was served with the court summons. Mr Peter Kabatsi of Kampala Associated Advocates is the lead lawyer.

Mr Peter Kabatsi of Kampala A

Mr Peter Kabatsi of Kampala Associated Advocates

The two law firms will now battle it out with Bank of Uganda’s legal team of MMAKS Advocates and A.F. Mpanga Advocates.

MMAKS and A.F. Mpanga are ranked in Band 1 of the Chambers and Partners rankings of advocates.
About a fortnight ago, Bank of Uganda sued Mr Ruparelia and his Meera Investments in the Commercial Court, seeking to recover Shs397b the central bank accuses him of siphoning out of his liquidated Crane Bank.
The central bank accuses Ruparelia and Meera Investments of fleecing Crane Bank of billions of shillings in systemic fraudulent transactions and invoices.

Related content

Particulars of the Bank of Uganda submissions in the Commercial Court state that Mr Ruparelia fraudulently took $92.8m (about Shs334b) and another Shs8.2 billion of depositors’ money from his Crane Bank for personal gain.
It is further alleged that Mr Ruparelia and his associates Vivek Sharma and Rakesh Gupta, created false invoices to bill Crane Bank for activities that did not happen.
The central bank took over Crane Bank on October 20, 2016 after its capital dwindled to below the statutory minimum, placing depositors’ money at risk.

Bank of Uganda attributed this fiasco to the bank’s Non-Performing Loans. At the time of collapse, Crane Bank, which was solely owned by Ruparelia, was ranked the third largest bank in Uganda.
In January 2017, Crane Bank was liquidated to dfcu Bank which took over some of the defunct bank’s assets and liabilities pending completion of a forensic audit ordered by Bank of Uganda.
It is on the strength of the audit findings that Bank of Uganda took a decision to sue Mr Ruparelia.

editorial@ug.nationmedia.com

Go to Source

I dumped computer game, deleted my movies to stay focused – Onakoya, Law School first-class graduate

Onakoya Oludare, 25, could not make first class as an undergraduate at the Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago Iwoye, Ogun State, where he studied Law, but he made it in Law School in 2016 and that was a milestone for him. In this interview with TUNDE AJAJA, he speaks on the things he did differently

Did you have any specific target when you were an undergraduate?

I didn’t really plan to have first class in the university. I just wanted to give it my all and satisfy myself that I had given my all, and if that was good enough to have a first class, then good, but if not, then I would still be content knowing that I had given my best. So, I didn’t feel bad, I was satisfied I had given my best and I still finished as one of the best students in my class. So that was sufficient consolation. However, in Law School, I planned to do everything I could possibly do to have first class.

How easy or challenging was it to graduate with a first class from the Law school?

Even though it’s easier to have first class in the Law School than in the university, it didn’t come easy either. Law school was a sprint, while university was a marathon, and you would agree with me that it’s a lot easier to get tired and give up in a marathon than it is in a sprint. However, the workload was much and we were required to really put in a lot of hours if we wished to be at the top of our game. But I knew it wasn’t impossible, so I saw the challenge as one that could be surmounted, and by God’s grace, it was. I became more focused, more so that law school was for a year. So, I was completely focused in my academics for that year, with little time for extra-curricular activities. In my early days in the university, I made it a principle to speak to only those who had excelled in their academics and not people who would tell me all the reasons it was impossible to pass a course. And that helped me greatly.

Is Law what you have always wanted to study?

Initially, I wished to be a pastor, though I can’t remember why. However, I got scared because I felt I wasn’t ready to be in a profession where I would be fighting witches and wizards all the time. No thanks to the Nigerian movies we used to watch then. My elder siblings were both in the sciences and so it was presumed I would also join them. It wasn’t until JSS3 when I discovered I was terrible at Chemistry and Physics that I decided it was possible my talent was elsewhere. I then joined the Art class and the next logical step was to start working towards being a lawyer as I had always been good at logical reasoning and argument, so law just seemed like the perfect choice. Also, I was attracted to the legal profession because of the challenge it presents. I wasn’t ready to settle down for a job where I would be doing the same tasks every day. I wanted a profession that would keep me engaged and challenged, and law seemed to fit in rightly.

Would you tie your success to how many hours you read or there was more to it?

The only thing I can say I did differently was that I read with understanding. I’m sure there are people that read more than I did and put in more hours than I did, but success at the bar finals isn’t necessarily about how many hours you read, but how much you understand. Therefore, I didn’t try cramming anything. I was aware that law school could be very tricky with questions, so I read and ensured that I understood everything I was reading. I also made sure I read during my peak periods, to ensure that I gained most with less time wasted.

Given your target in Law School, were there things you were used to that you left behind?

I like playing computer games a lot, it’s one of my hobbies, but while in law school, I left my game controller at home to allow me to focus more. I also deleted a lot of movies on my laptop and I made sure I didn’t download any new movie to avoid temptation. I kept reminding myself that law school was just for a year and I could afford to starve myself of these things to aid myself in getting my desired result. Then, there was lesser distraction in law school; nobody had time for frivolous pursuits. We all knew what was at stake and so there was no time to waste.

Would you say you improved on your performance in your previous schools?

In primary and secondary schools, I was just above average. I was one of those who used to follow the brilliant students for competitions, to serve as backup (laughs). I think I hadn’t yet figured out what I was really doing. In my first Unified Matriculation Examination, I scored 234, which could not get me Law in UNILAG. I was offered English. After that, I was admitted for Diploma in Law in OOU which I didn’t complete, but the knowledge gained from my brief stay was invaluable because I took the exam again the following year and I had 275. That combined with my Post-UME result made me the candidate with the highest mark in my set of admission in OOU.

What was your typical day like in the Law School?

I made sure I read about the topic we were to treat that day before going to class. After the day’s activities, I would retire back to the hostel to read the topic we covered that day, and then relax either with my friends or see a short movie before going to bed. I believe in reading when my brain is at its best, because I don’t have much stamina for reading. So, I was reading for maximum of three hours daily. I also ensured I got not less than eight hours sleep every night to ensure that I was mentally alert in class the next day. I never subscribed to the idea of reading all through the night and then sleeping in class. I believe most of the work was done in class, so I always ensured I had a good night sleep. Also, I wasn’t the type to use the library often. I only visited the library once during my stay there. I thank God for my roommate who was a really understanding guy, so I did most of my reading in my room. My reading pattern was quite simple, I would read a page, and then explain it to myself in the mirror to ensure I had understood it. Also, explaining to other people really helped me grasp the course contents. A lot of the time, people just read and assume they have understood, meanwhile they haven’t. And like I have mentioned earlier, understanding is key. I also wasn’t much of a fan of forming notes, but I had a sort of key points which I formed during the externship period (court attachment and chambers attachment) which was of great help to me when I was revising for the exams.

These days, a number of students fail in the Law School and have to retake some exams. From observation, why do students fail, more so that they have reduced workload and it’s just a one-year programme?

The workload isn’t reduced at all. There’s so much more to do within so little time. I would attribute the reason for failure to fear. Fear is what makes people panic and start running helter-skelter looking for materials, attending needless tutorials and basically wasting time that isn’t enough in the first place. And once you start being panicky, your ability to pass the bar exams is greatly affected. I must also thank my parents for making sure that I was comfortable. Their assured support helped greatly. They encouraged me and they were a major source of inspiration to me. I owe everything I am to them and God.

Would you like to practise law or you have interest in other things?

I would like to practise law.

Which area would you like to specialise in?

My initial area of interest was dispute resolution; litigation and arbitration, but now that I’m being exposed to the corporate/commercial field, let me just say I’m still undecided. But overall, the complexity and diversity of law really interests me always. Law is multifaceted, complex, voluminous and technical. I agree with that description, but that’s what I find interesting about it. And I like the fact that law isn’t predictable.

What were your most memorable moments?

My happiest moments in school and law school would be when I was called out of the crowd for awards with my mum in the audience. My most embarrassing moment in the law school was when I asked a question in class once and my lecturer basically said it was a stupid question. I wanted the ground to open up and swallow me. Imagine being told your question is stupid in front of 1,700 people. But everything happens for a reason, so I didn’t let that deter me; rather it gave me more incentive as I felt I had something to prove to that lecturer.

Where would you like to work?

I’m currently a corps member in one of the top law firms in Nigeria. It’s a firm I won’t mind staying on with if they would have me. It’s a great place to be. In the immediate future, I wish to explore the world of legal practice to determine the area I would like to do my Master’s in and probably specialise in. My preferred schools for Master’s would be either Harvard or Oxford.

For the benefit of those who see Law School as a difficult phase to go through, what would you say are the basic ingredients of success in academics?

I would point to four ingredients. God, interest, discipline and determination.

Was there anything you did as regards your academics that you would never forget?

Without a doubt, the most extreme thing I did in the law school was when I read Ogbuanya’s Corporate Law Practice textbook from cover to cover in less than 24 hours. I had been having issues with Corporate Law and Practice, so, one Saturday, I decided that one way or the other, I would crack the course. And I started and didn’t stop till I finished. My roommate just kept looking at me like I was crazy.

Knowing that you have to cite cases while answering questions during your exams, were there methods you deployed to help you remember things?

For remembering cases, what I usually did was to take the names of the parties and link them with people I know who also bear those names. So, when I had to remember those cases, all I had to do was remember the person, and I would remember his/her name, and automatically remember the case.

Were there people who saw you as being too serious?

On the contrary, I believe there would have been quite a number of people who were surprised that I made a first class as I wasn’t one of those who used to answer questions or make serious contributions in class, I just did my own thing quietly, I wasn’t always in the library or leading grand discussions on how to pass the bar finals, so I doubt I really came across as being too serious.

Were there times you almost gave up on having first class?

I kept on believing that it was possible, so I never gave up on having first class.

Do you believe in having mentors, and did you have one?

I had a guide during my law school days, Mrs. Opeyemi Awolesi, who finished a few years ahead of me in the university and had a first class from the law school. I do believe in having mentors as it’s easier to see farther when you stand on the shoulders of those who have gone before you.

Thousands of lawyers are released into the system yearly. Are you sometimes bothered about the issues of the country’s unemployment rate, especially as it concerns first class graduates?

I’m not as concerned about unemployment rate as most lawyers usually find one way or the other to get engaged, but I’m really disturbed by the remuneration packages most firms offer young lawyers, with some even going to the extent of saying that they don’t pay new wigs. This has always been the case, but I would really hope something could be done about it. We aren’t complaining about the work load, just that the pay should be commensurate.

Copyright PUNCH.               
All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from PUNCH.

Contact: [email protected]

Go to Source