Latest Posts

Pomerantz Law Firm Reminds Shareholders with Losses on their Investment in Polaris Industries, Inc. of Class Action Lawsuit and Upcoming Deadline – PII

NEW YORK, Oct. 30, 2016 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Pomerantz LLP announces that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Polaris Industries, Inc. (“Polaris” or the “Company”) (NYSE:PII) and certain of its officers. The class action, filed in United States District Court, District of Minnesota, and docketed under 16-cv-03108, is on behalf of a class consisting of all persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Polaris securities between January 26, 2016 and September 11, 2016 both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”).  This class action seeks to recover damages against Defendants for alleged violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). 

If you are a shareholder who purchased Polaris securities during the Class Period, you have until November 15, 2016 to ask the Court to appoint you as Lead Plaintiff for the class.  A copy of the Complaint can be obtained at To discuss this action, contact Robert S. Willoughby at or 888.476.6529 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll free, ext. 9980. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address, telephone number, and number of shares purchased. 

[Click here to join this class action]

Polaris, together with its subsidiaries, designs, engineers, manufactures, and markets off-road vehicles, snowmobiles, motorcycles, and on-road vehicles in the United States, Canada, Western Europe, Australia, and Mexico.

On July 23, 2015, Polaris issued a recall for the Company’s model-year 2016 Youth RZR off-highway vehicle, citing fire hazards.  Three other recalls of the Company’s RZR vehicles followed—in October 2015, December 2015, and April 2016—affecting more than 160,000 RZR vehicles of various model years.

Nevertheless, Polaris consistently advised investors that the Company expected full year 2016 net income to be at least $6.00 per diluted share.  On January 26, 2016, Polaris issued a press release reporting full-year guidance in the range of $6.20 to $6.80 per diluted share; on April 21, 2016, Polaris issued a press release maintaining the same guidance estimate; and on July 20, 2016, Polaris issued a press release only slightly lowering and narrowing its guidance range to $6.00 to $6.30 per diluted share.

The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects.  Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company was unable to sufficiently validate the initially identified repair for certain of its recalled RZR vehicles; (ii) as a result, the Company would ultimately need to implement a more complex and expensive repair solution; (iii) the financial impact of RZR vehicle recalls was therefore greater than the Company had disclosed to investors; (iv) consequently, the Company had overstated its full-year 2016 guidance; and (v) as a result of the foregoing, Polaris’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times. 

On September 12, 2016, pre-market, Polaris issued a press release announcing that the Company was lowering its full-year 2016 earnings guidance to the range of $3.30 to $3.80 per diluted share.  The Company attributed the lowered guidance to the impact of RZR thermal-related problems, citing, in part, the Company’s inability “to sufficiently validate the initially identified RZR Turbo recall repair, necessitating a more complex and expensive repair solution.”

On this news, Polaris stock fell $4.05, or 5.01%, to close at $76.79 on September 12, 2016.

The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York, Chicago, Florida, and Los Angeles, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 80 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See

Robert S. Willoughby
Pomerantz LLP

Go to Source

Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard P.C. listed among top law firms in 2016 Settlement Survey

The Illinois law firm of Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard P.C. was highlighted in Chicago Lawyer Magazine’s 2016 Settlement Survey as one of the top law firms in the state.

The annual survey is based on settlements reported to the Jury Verdict Reporter between July 2015 and June 2016 that were $500,000 or more. The report includes confidential settlements for which Jury Verdict Reporter editors were able to verify details between both parties.

The 2016 Settlement Survey included 563 settlements, totaling $1.1 billion. Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard P.C. ranked in the top 9, settling eleven cases for a total of $25,500,000.

“We are honored once again be recognized among the top firms in the state. The achievement is a testament to the hard work our lawyers put in on a daily basis,” Managing Partner Patrick A. Salvi said.

Go to Source

Files of firms in Sh5.3b scandal go missing from AG office

The Sh5.3 billion scandal at Afya House has taken a new twist after it emerged that registration details of companies involved in the transactions have gone missing from the State Law Office.PHOTO; COURTESY

The Sh5.3 billion scandal at Afya House has taken a new twist after it emerged that registration details of companies involved in the transactions have gone missing from the State Law Office.

Staff at the Companies Registry were yesterday unable to trace the files for Estama Investments, registered as an EPZ company, and Life Care Medics.

The two companies were beneficiaries of cash meant for patients, expectant mothers and new-born babies.

Records of a third supplier, Medafrica, were non-existent, raising questions about its identity.

Without the files, it becomes impossible to unmask the people behind what may turn out to be the biggest scandal in the Jubilee administration.

“Thousands of patients and doctors have suffered from this theft as unearthed by the auditor. This is totally unacceptable and we must know who the thieves are,” said Ouma Oluga, the secretary general of the Kenya Medical Practitioners and Dentists Union.

It was not immediately possible to get an input from the Attorney General, who is the head of the State Law Office, relating to the missing files.

An official who attended to the request by The Standard was only able to get the registration numbers of the companies but said additional information such as directorship were only contained in the physical file.

In another failed attempt to get details of sampled companies, an officer from the Registry said the missing files may have been displaced before offering to locate them herself.

Reforms undertaken at the Companies Registry, a department at the office of the AG, which include digitisation of records were anticipated to tackle the “lost files” menace and enhance transparency.

Missing company files have in the past frustrated investigations into major corruption scandals even slowing the progress of court proceedings.

Estama Investments Ltd was the biggest beneficiary of the payments after receiving Sh1 billion. The Standard was only able to establish that it was registered in June 19, 2008.

1 2
Next »

Go to Source

FiRe Award judges flag up failure to comply with new companies law

Julius Mwatu, the ICPAK vice chairman. PHOTO | WACHIRA MWANGI 

Thursday, October 27  
2016 at 

Several firms that submitted their annual reports and financial statements for this year’s Financial Reporting Award (FiRe Award) have not complied with the new Companies Act.

The Institute of Certified Public Accountants of Kenya (ICPAK), the promoters of the awards, Thursday said non-compliance with the new law was among the issues flagged by the panel of judges that evaluated the entries.

Under section 148 of the Companies Act, Cap 486, a company is required to present the balance sheet and profit and loss account as well as a statement of compliance.

“Management should ensure that they include a statement of compliance with the Companies Act,” said Julius Mwatu, the ICPAK vice chairman, during a one-day conference held in Nairobi ahead of Friday’s gala dinner and award ceremony.

The new Act, which came into force last year, defines the duties of company directors more clearly and imposes stringent fines or a jail term on wayward directors, among others.

The Fire Awards, which is in its 15th year, is an initiative of the ICPAK, the Capital Markets Authority (CMA), the Nairobi Securities Exchange (NSE) and Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (PSASB).

Its promoters said a total of 399 entries were received — 303 from the public sector and 96 from the private sector.

The panel of judges cited failure to include the name and signature of the accounting officer who signed the annual report and audited financial statements as being among the compliance issues.

They also noted that disclosure of assets and liabilities require significant improvement to facilitate inventory of assets.

“It was noted that a number of entities are yet to incorporate some of the changes introduced and the evaluators hope that by next year there should be significant improvements in the reporting and practices of governance,” said Mr Mwatu.

Go to Source

Back-tax scam of 15,000 in U.S. ends with indictments of 56 people, 5 Indian firms

The scam is familiar: Someone pretending to be an IRS agent calls and says you owe back taxes and must pay up now or risk arrest.

Federal authorities announced Thursday that a three-year investigation has identified dozens of people involved in a fraudulent scheme run out of India-based call centers that scammed at least 15,000 people out of more than $300 million.

The Justice Department has indicted 56 people and five Indian companies on charges including wire fraud and money laundering in connection with the international phone scam. Authorities announced that 20 people had been arrested and that they would be seeking extradition for those accused in the scheme who remain in India.

The scammers, based in Ahmedabad, India, targeted immigrants and the elderly for the calls and pretended to be IRS agents, Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell said Thursday. Once a victim was on the phone, the call center operators “threatened potential victims with arrest, imprisonment, fines or deportation if they did not pay taxes or penalties to the government,” according to the indictment.

The callers culled personally identifiable information about their victims from sources, including social media, and used systems that spoof the phone numbers from which they were calling to make their requests appear legitimate, prosecutors said.

Those who agreed to pay were told to withdraw cash, then purchase prepaid debit cards from various retail stores and provide the unique serial numbers for the cards to the fake agents. The scammers often used stolen personal information from other victims to register the debit cards and then move the money via wire transfers, prosecutors said.

Indian law enforcement arrested 70 people earlier this month in a similar but separate scam operation.

Prosecutors will try to seek monetary judgments against those charged, but the 15,000 victims in this case are unlikely to be able to recover the stolen money, prosecutors said.

“The sad thing about these scams is often once the money is paid, it’s gone,” Ms. Caldwell said.

Although these arrests will put a dent in call center scam operations, Ms. Caldwell said, it will not entirely shut down such operations.

“A lot of the folks we are arresting today can be replaced by other people,” she said.

Investigators encouraged people to remain cautious about such scams.

“Do not let your guard down. These people are persistent,” said Russell George, inspector general of the U.S. Treasury inspector general for tax administration. “I do expect these people are resilient and will not give up.”

One victim in the scheme was called multiple times over a 20-day period as the callers demanded payments for what they said were tax violations. He ended up paying the scammers $136,000.

Anyone who receives such a call should hang up and report the call to authorities, Mr. George said.

blog comments powered by
Go to Source

SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of Rent-A-Center, Inc. – RCII

NEW YORK, Oct. 27, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Rent-A-Center, Inc. (“Rent-A-Center” or the “Company”)

RCII, +1.89%

(isin:US76009N1000). Investors are advised to contact Robert S. Willoughby at or 888-476-6529, ext. 9980.

The investigation concerns whether Rent-A-Center and certain of its officers and/or directors have violated the federal securities laws.

[Click here to join a class action]

On October 11, 2016, Rent-A-Center announced that the Company was experiencing issues with its point-of-sale systems (“POS”) that would negatively impact Rent-A-Center’s sales. On this news, Rent-A-Center stock fell $3.70, or 28.73%, to close at $9.18. Then, on October 26, 2016, Rent-A-Center announced financial and operating results for the third quarter of 2016 that fell significantly below estimates, citing, in part, POS issues that had caused system outages.

The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York, Chicago, Florida, and Los Angeles, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 80 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See

CONTACT:Robert S. Willoughby
Pomerantz LLP

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:–rcii-300353161.html

SOURCE Pomerantz LLP

Copyright (C) 2016 PR Newswire. All rights reserved

Go to Source

Brazilian business brightens  Brazilian firms emerge from the gloom

“BRAZIL is back in business,” proclaimed Abílio Diniz, chairman of BRF, a Brazilian pork and poultry giant, at a recent investor shindig. Really? The economy, mired in recession since mid-2014, is not expected to stir before the end of the year—and then only sluggishly. After rebounding in the first half of 2016, industrial production plummeted again in August. Retail sales fell by more than forecast. Firms expect to hire just 100,000 temporary workers in the run-up to Christmas, 3% fewer than last year’s already low tally. BRF’s own domestic operations are hardly a picture of health. Sales dropped by 5% in the second quarter, year on year (though this was offset by rising global revenues).

For all that, Mr Diniz is not alone in his optimism. Surveys point to rising confidence among bosses and consumers alike (see chart). Investors’ spirits are up—and with them the São Paulo stockmarket, which has returned to levels last seen in 2012. The real has strengthened by a third against the dollar since January.

The collective mood swing has less to do with the real economy, and more with realpolitik. In August the left-wing president, Dilma Rousseff, was impeached, ending months of uncertainty. Her pragmatic deputy, Michel Temer, will serve out the remaining 26 months off her term.

Brazil Inc wasn’t always anti-Rousseff. When she came to office in 2011 and lavished cheap credit and tax breaks on firms, bosses did not complain. They rebelled when her constant meddling first distorted, then crippled, the economy.

The Temer government looks both more fiscally responsible than its predecessor, and more responsive to businesses’ concerns. Bosses gush about easy access to ministers, even the president himself. They applaud the administration’s commitment to narrow the confidence-sapping budget deficit, which exploded to 10% of GDP on Ms Rousseff’s watch. Mr Diniz’s remarks came after Mr Temer’s proposed constitutional amendment to freeze government expenditures in real terms for 20 years handily cleared the first of four congressional votes. It passed the second on October 25th. A complementary reform to over-generous public pensions is in the works.

A promise of fiscal rectitude has helped dampen inflation expectations, allowing the central bank to cut interest rates for the first time in four years on October 19th, from 14.25% to 14%. Further cuts to Brazil’s high rates—the number-one bugbear of many a Brazilian boss—are expected. So too are other market-friendly measures, such as easing onerous local-content requirements for some industries and enlisting the private sector to build and run roads, ports and airports.

Still, notes Carlos de Freitas of the National Confederation of Commerce, a lobby group, “The real economy does not live on expectations alone”. For business to thrive, bosses never tire of repeating, Brazil must also tackle assorted structural deficiencies. Besides costly credit, perennial grumbles include shoddy infrastructure, unskilled workers, convoluted taxes, rigid labour laws and Byzantine bureaucracy.

Some take matters into their own hands. Daimler, a German carmaker, teaches English to technicians so that they can read technical manuals. Fed up with waiting for Rio de Janeiro’s municipal government to build a promised access road to its research centre, General Electric paid for it to be paved. Singaporean shareholders of Aegea, a water utility, could not understand why a firm with revenues of 795m reais needed a private jet—until Hamilton Amadeo, its boss, showed them it was cheaper than relying on commercial flights and cars once the cost of executives’ lost time was added in.

Most companies cannot afford language classes, let alone jets. All abhor red tape. In the office of Guilherme Afif, chairman of SEBRAE, a group for small businesses, a printout of all the rules even tiny firms must obey takes up fully five metres of shelf space. The average Brazilian corporation spends 2,600 man-hours annually complying with the tax code, ten times the global figure (see article).

For decades, fixing these gripes has eluded even popular presidents. Mr Temer isn’t one, at least outside business circles. Some bosses urge him to undertake tough, early action. Others reckon that an all-out assault on workers’ rights or states’ tax-raising powers do not behove a president who lacks the legitimacy of an elected leader. Better to stick with emergency fiscal measures and leave deeper reforms to his successor. Many would be content with stop-gaps: a law to make outsourcing easier, say, rather than an overhaul of the sacrosanct labour code dating back to 1943.

In the meantime, euphoria over Ms Rousseff’s exit is tempered with caution. A tractor-maker in the southern state of Santa Catarina could use an extra 50 staff, its boss admits. But he is loth to hire, lest Mr Temer stumbles and confidence evaporates. “We are hoping for the best,” echoes the boss of a big education provider who has also ordered a hiring freeze. “But we are planning for the worst.”

Go to Source

Israeli regulator seeks more power to crack down on binary option firms

* Securities regulator seeks amendment to give him more

* Israel banned sale of binary options to Israelis in March

* Hauser disturbed by “ugly phenomenon” that hurts people

By Tova Cohen

TEL AVIV, Oct 27 Israel’s securities regulator
wants to expand his authority so he can ban the sale of binary
options overseas by online trading firms based in Israel, a
business that is drawing international criticism over
allegations of illicit practices.

The Israel Securities Authority in March became the world’s
first regulator to prohibit the risky transactions from being
offered domestically. Now its chairman, Shmuel Hauser, has asked
the attorney general to consider amending the law to give him
power to target groups marketing them abroad as well.

A Reuters special report published last month shed light on
the extent of the industry and accusations by London-based
lawyers who say hundreds of their clients were duped out of vast
sums of money by some Israeli firms.

“The Israel Securities Authority is working vigorously with
other enforcement agencies to deal with this issue,” the ISA
said in a statement.

“Hauser is very disturbed by this ugly phenomenon that hurts
innocent people and unfortunately fuels a negative image of
Israelis and Jews.”

An amendment to the law would likely require parliamentary
approval. A spokeswoman for the ISA said she could not estimate
how long such a process might take. The attorney general’s
office was not immediately available for comment.

Binary options involve placing a bet on whether the value of
a financial asset – a currency, a commodity or a stock – will
rise or fall in a fixed timeframe, sometimes as short as a
minute. Many large operators are based in Israel.

The fast-growing industry sells itself as a legitimate
investment, but clients of some of the firms say they are little
more than high-pressure scams. They accuse the companies of
transferring money between accounts without approval and in some
cases of preventing them from withdrawing their own funds.

Because they are based online and allow trading from
smartphones or tablets, the industry has attracted a vast number
of users who are not professional dealers.

After numerous complaints, Hauser banned the online trading
firms from selling binary options to Israelis, but he did not
have the authority to prevent them from marketing overseas.

Other countries, including Belgium, have since banned binary
options trading. The United States requires binary options to be
traded on regulated markets. Elsewhere, online operators
continue to operate freely, and are effectively unregulated.

Despite the ban on selling to Israelis, several of the
biggest binary options businesses are either run from Israel
with Israeli technology, sales and support staff, or are
registered to Israeli citizens.

Calling binary options trading “in essence gambling”, Hauser
in the statement quoted from the biblical Book of Isaiah, saying
“your destroyers and they that made you waste shall go forth of

All possible measures must be taken to stop them, he added.

The ISA said it is aiding securities regulators around the
world to deal with binary options “criminals” when they request
such aid.

(Editing by Richard Balmforth)

Go to Source

Scam financial gambling sites are fronted by Scots shell firms

AT LEAST a dozen unregulated financial gambling sites – many derided as scams – are now being fronted by Scottish shell firms.

Online brokers which offer all-or-nothing bets on currency and stock markets have set up shop in Aberdeen, Glasgow and especially Edinburgh as they take advantage of Scotland’s soft-touch corporate registration regime.

Gamblers make fixed-odd bets on financial markets via so-called “binary options” websites.

The Herald yesterday revealed that the now arrested owners of one such website had used a controversial Scottish limited partnership (SLPs) to run their business.

Haim Toledano and Saar Pilosof were detained in their native Israel, believed to be the global hub of the industry after being accused of a multi-million-shekel tax evasion.

Their site,, had already been described as a scam by regulators in Australia.

An investigation by this newspaper has also identified 11 other websites offering similar unregulated market gambling through Scottish shell firms, mostly SLPs.

An analysis of binary options websites suggests that their formal ownership is migrating to Scotland from other jurisdictions.

This revelation comes as SNP MP Roger Mullin in the House of Commons on Wednesday once again urged the UK Government to review the century-old reserved Scots Law which allows the secret owners of SLPs to pay no tax and file no accounts.

Another critic of the current regime, Andy Wightman MSP of the Scottish Greens, said: “The extent to which an obscure legal entity established in 1907 is now, over a century later, being used for an exotic cocktail of nefarious schemes around the world is breathtaking.

“I am continuing to press the Scottish Government to sit down with me and explore how the criminal law of Scotland can be amended to increase the powers of law enforcement agencies in Scotland.”

Andy Wightman MSP

Herald Scotland: Andy Wightman has no idea where the posters backing his candidacy came from

Binary options sites with Scottish links include Imperial Options, which claims to be owned and managed by an SLP registered at the same Edinburgh virtual office as’s owner.

Imperial Options, which uses a Russian domain name but has sites in English and Russian, has been the subject of international warnings. One of Canada’s regulators, the British Columbia Securities Commission, has urged investors to “exercise caution” with the site.

However, this warning was made nearly a year before Imperial Options’ formal owner, Global Transactions, was incorporated this April, suggesting the website has switched its “brass plate” ownership to Scotland.

Other similar websites citing Scottish legal addresses and fronted by SLPs include Stack Options, HBC Broker, St Binary, Nexcapindex, Sigma Option, Expert Option, and RW Markets. The Herald has previously named Finpari, Barclays Traders and Solution-Capital as binary options trading sites using Scottish shell companies. All three were the subject of warnings from French regulators.

Some of the nominally Scottish binary options traders feature warnings that investments are high risk. These includes St Binary, whose website is covered in British symbols, including red Routemaster buses and signage for the London Underground. It is formally owned by a newly created SLP called Smith and Taylor Financial Services, one of whose partners is an entirely opaque firm called Optimal Success Limited, of the Marshall Islands. The only contact for Optimal Success is an address on Majuro, a tiny atoll in the Pacific.

Binary options sites have historically used the Marshall Islands, not Scotland, as their official places of registration. British watchdog the Financial Conduct Authority believes such sites should be regulated – but by gaming authorities, not financial ones. Other states are moving to ban the sites altogether.

Go to Source