Stockholm — On Monday, Swedish furniture giant Ikea said its tax deals in the Netherlands did not breach EU laws, after the European Commission launched a probe into how the company allegedly slashed its tax bill on revenue from megastores around the world.
“The way we have been taxed by national authorities, has in our view been in accordance with EU rules,” Ikea said in a written statement to AFP.
“It is good if the investigation can bring clarity and confirm that,” the Netherlands-based company added.
The EU’s investigation into the Swedish furniture giant’s tax deals in the Netherlands is the latest salvo by Brussels against the tax affairs of multinationals.
The case is the most ambitious one yet by Brussels against a multinational from Europe, and follows similar cases against US heavyweights Apple, Amazon and McDonald’s.
They all come amid a wave of revelations such as the “Paradise Papers” and “Lux Leaks” that have turned the spotlight on how multinationals and the world’s super rich use legal means to avoid paying tax.
“All companies, big or small, multinational or not, should pay their fair share of tax,” the EU’s antitrust commissioner Margrethe Vestager said in a statement.
“Member states cannot let selected companies pay less tax by allowing them to artificially shift their profits elsewhere,” she said.
The commission put no figure on its latest allegations against Ikea, but a report by the Green party in European Parliament in 2016 said Ikea avoided €1bn in EU taxes between 2009 to 2014.
Privately held since its creation in 1943, the IKEA group has a complex corporate structure and is run by various foundations that has allowed it to stay clear of Sweden’s high taxes.
The commission’s probe concerns two tax agreements brokered between the Netherlands and Inter Ikea, a Dutch-based unit of the retail giant that receives franchise fees from Ikea shops worldwide.
In the first tax ruling, between 2006 and 2011, Inter Ikea was allowed by the Netherlands to pay a hefty licence fee to another Ikea unit in Luxembourg, thereby shifting revenue to a jurisdiction where it remained untaxed.
In 2011, after Brussels forced a law change in Luxembourg, Inter Ikea arranged a second ruling with the Netherlands, this time involving a complex loan arrangement with an Ikea unit in Liechtenstein, and again the Swedish company successfully shifted taxable revenue to a low tax jurisdiction.
“The Netherlands fully supports the Commission’s work,” said a senior Dutch EU official, adding that the government would have to look at the details of the case.
The move against Ikea came at the urging of the Greens party in European Parliament which mounted a major campaign to put the spotlight on Ikea.
“This is a huge success for the Greens as it comes from our initial complaint. Europe works,” MEP Sven Giegold said.
“It is shocking that the Netherlands, a founding member of the EU, is one of the biggest tax havens in the world,” he said.
Many of the Brussels probes came in the wake of the “Luxleaks” scandal which disclosed details of tax breaks given by the wealthy duchy to dozens of major US firms.
The disclosures came as a particular embarrassment for European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker, who was prime minister of Luxembourg at the time when the tax deals were made.
In similar cases against tax deals for coffee-shop chain Starbucks in the Netherlands Vestager ordered the latte and espresso-maker to pay roughly €30m in back taxes.
In accordance with Vestager’s blockbuster 2015 decision against Apple, Ireland said earlier in December that it would begin collecting the €13bn in back taxes owed by the US-based iPhone-maker.