NYC Public Advocate Urges JP Morgan to Divest From Private Prison Firms Tied to Trump Agenda

NEW YORK, NY - DECEMBER 03: New York City Public Advocate Letitia James speaks after a grand jury decided not to indict New York Police Officer Daniel Pantaleo in Eric Garner's death, on December 3, 2014 in the Staten Island borough of New York City. Garner died after being placed in a chokehold by Pantaleo in July. The altercation was captured in a widely viewed video. (Photo by Andrew Burton/Getty Images)

New York City Public Advocate Letitia James. Andrew Burton/Getty Images

Public Advocate Letitia James called on JP Morgan Chase to end its relationship with two private prison companies that she asserted are profiting from President Donald Trump’s aggressive immigrant enforcement agenda.

James penned a letter to JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon—an advisor and occasional critic of the president—asking him to terminate his company’s agreements with The Geo Group and CoreCivic, divest whatever assets it has in the companies and to publicly reveal the amount and justification for fees and interest income received that are associated with JP Morgan’s underwriting or lending activities with the companies. She also requested that Dimon donate all fees and interest income linked to those activities to organizations working to provide immigrants with legal assistance, to denounce Trump’s “anti-immigrant agenda” publicly and renounce his role on the president’s business council.

“We have a moral and legal responsibility to hold business leaders who are responsible for financing the Trump agenda accountable for their support of these divisive and bigoted policies, and JP Morgan is no exception,” James said in a statement provided to the Observer. “New York City has long been the progressive capital of this country and we will continue to go after any company that tries to compromise that.”

She asked Dimon to contact her office by May 25 to explain what JP Morgan will do to end its relationships with The Geo Group and CoreCivic as well as its plans to speak out “against the anti-immigrant abuses perpetrated and considered by President Trump.”

In her missive to Dimon, James noted that The Geo Group, whose existence she says “depends on revolving credit from banks such as yours,” has been accused of flouting the Trafficking Victims Protection Act—which governs how the federal government fights human trafficking domestically and globally—by forcing immigrant detainees to work without pay by threatening to put them in solitary confinement. She also said the company recently authored a Texas bill that would enable it to bypass existing law against jailing immigrant children.

And she said CoreCivic has been accused of being entangled in controversies including “turning a blind eye toward violence, the potentially preventable deaths of immigrant detainees, and prison labor abuse of immigrants.”

She noted that as recently as late 2016, the private prison industry “appeared to be on the ropes” after former President Barack Obama’s Justice Department announced that it would cut down on the use of private prisons. She said that even though stocks in such companies have bounced back under the Trump administration, it is clear that their fortunes are “inextricably tied to a volatile political situation.”

She recalled that Trump’s agenda suffered major setbacks given his temporarily-blocked executive orders barring entry to people from Muslim-majority countries and a spending bill that prohibits funding for his proposal to build a wall along the Mexican border. She also noted that private prison stocks momentarily suffered when Attorney General Jeff Sessions caught flak for giving inaccurate testimony to the Senate regarding campaign season meetings he held with Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador.

James acknowledged the memo that JP Morgan’s operating committee—which includes Dimon—sent to all employees stating its “unwavering commitment” to all employees in the wake of Trump’s first Muslim travel ban and offering support to anyone affected by it. She also noted his support for a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants and his annual letter to shareholders in early April in which he speaks of the risks that come with “anti-trade and anti-immigration positions.”

But she said that JP Morgan is the single largest holder of both The Geo Group and CoreCivic corporate bonds and blasted Dimon’s “continued presence” on Trump’s business council. Dimon turned down Trump’s offer to serve as his treasury secretary.

She added that JP Morgan has “millions of dollars” with the city, receives “millions of dollars” in fees as a broker, a consultant and an advisor to the New York City Employee Retirement System—and that NYCERS, to which she is a trustee, has “hundreds of millions of dollars invested in your stocks and fixed income instruments.”

She said the institution’s decision to make a long-term investment in the private prison industry raises red flags with respect to the “risk analysis and decision making processes employed by your firm.”

The city, she said, may weigh such concerns as it decides which financial institutions with which it will continue to conduct business or to which it will grant future contracts. She added that NYCERS will make similar determinations with respect to determining which advisors to work with and companies in which to invest.

“In New York City, we plan to continue investing in our immigrant communities,” James wrote in the letter. “We will do so because it is the right thing to do, and because it makes for smart policy. NYCERS has undertaken a review of its private prison holdings and as a trustee I support the efforts to divest. I want to know that the corporations we do business with share this prudent outlook.”

Jonathan Burns, a CoreCivic spokesman, said the company does not draft, lobby for, promote or take positions on proposals, policies or legislation that determine the basis or duration of an individual’s incarceration or detention and that CoreCivic has been operating detention facilities for more than 30 years under Republican and Democratic administrations.

He also noted that no child is held in a correctional facility and that they partnered with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to oversee the construction and management of, which he has recreation areas, classrooms and family housing units. And he added that CoreCivic’s ICE-contracted facilities are contractually required and must adhere to mandated performance-based national detention standards and family residential standards.

“The allegations in the letter are blatantly false,” Burns said. “We simply will not tolerate the lack of honesty in the public dialogue about our company or, even worse, the incredibly serious challenges facing our country that our company is working with our partners to solve.”

On the allegations of violating the Human Trafficking Act, The Geo Group said that the volunteer work program at all immigration facilities as well as the minimum wage rates and standards associated with the program are set by the federal government under national detention standards. And concerning the Texas bill, the company said that the policies related to the use of family residential centers are set exclusively by the federal government and that it has never taken a position on those policies.

“Our company has never taken a position on or advocated for or against specific immigration enforcement and detention policies,” the company said. “As a service provider to the federal government, our focus has always been and remains on providing high-quality services through private sector solutions to meet public sector challenges.

On May Day, immigrant advocacy group Make the Road New York and the Center for Popular Democracy launched the “Corporate Backers of Hate” campaign against nine corporations—including JP Morgan and Wells Fargo—they say are profiting from Trump’s agenda.

This story has been updated to include comments from CoreCivic and The Geo Group. 


Go to Source

Vietnam-aligned hackers attack foreign firms, fireeye says

(c) 2017, Bloomberg.

Cyber espionage attacks against foreign companies operating in Vietnam have been traced to a group of hackers “aligned with Vietnamese state interests,” according to a report from cyber-security provider FireEye.

The attacks by the group — designated by FireEye as APT32 — have been conducted since at least 2014, mainly targeting companies operating in the manufacturing, consumer products and hospitality sectors, FireEye said in the report released Sunday. The group has also targeted foreign governments, dissidents and journalists, it said.

“The unauthorized access could serve as a platform for law enforcement, intellectual property theft, or anti-corruption measures that could ultimately erode the competitive advantage of targeted organizations,” the report said.

“The government of Vietnam does not allow any form of cyber-attacks against organizations or individuals,” Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Le Thi Thu Hang said in an email. “All cyber-attacks or threats to cybersecurity, must be condemned and severely punished in accordance with regulations and laws.”

The report comes as a new wave ransom threats hit more than 200,000 computers in at least 150 countries, affecting companies and government agencies from the U.S. to Europe to Asia. The malware used a technique purportedly stolen from the U.S. National Security Agency.

APT32 conducted the attacks by leveraging files that use social-engineering methods to entice victims, FireEye said. The file then downloads malicious payloads from remote servers, with further attacks delivered via “phishing” emails, it said.

The group is also targeting security, technology infrastructure and consultancy companies, FireEye said, adding that APT32 continues to threaten political activism and free speech in Southeast Asia and the public sector worldwide.

“Governments, journalists, and members of the Vietnam diaspora may continue to be targeted,” the report said.

According to the report, examples of the attacks by APT32 include:

– A European corporation compromised prior to constructing a manufacturing facility in Vietnam (2014)

– Vietnamese and foreign-owned corporations working in network security, technology infrastructure, banking, and media industries (2016)

– Malware detected on the networks of a global hospitality industry developer with plans to expand operations into Vietnam (2016)

– Two subsidiaries of U.S. and Philippine consumer products corporations, located inside Vietnam (2016-2017)

– Vietnamese offices of a global consulting firm (2017)

“While actors from China, Iran, Russia, and North Korea remain the most active cyber espionage threats tracked and responded to by FireEye, APT32 reflects a growing host of new countries that have adopted this dynamic capability,” the report said.

– – –

With assistance from John Boudreau.

hacking-vietnam

Keywords: VIETNAM-HACKERS-FIREEYE1

Go to Source

Discrimination against Israeli firms in police tender?

The Knesset Economics Committee is scheduled to discuss, Tuesday, the exclusion of Israeli manufacturers from a bid proposal by the Israel Police for the manufacture of police uniforms, in violation of the Defense Textile Law.

According to Israeli manufacturers, the tender published by the police creates clear and blatant discrimination against Israeli manufacturers in favor of foreign producers through various clauses defined in the tender.

Go to Source

Career options available for young law graduates in India

National Law School and various other law schools in India are offering 5-year law courses after class XII. Some of these schools have created a great reputation for themselves with their alumni working for top law firms and MNCs. The opportunities available for graduates from any of the top law schools of India are phenomenal.

Earlier,
the legal profession was majorly limited to criminal and civil
litigation, however, with the country’s economy moving at a faster
pace in the positive direction, there is now a huge demand for highly
skilled lawyers in fields like banking & finance, infrastructure,
debt restructuring, corporate governance, mergers and acquisitions,
international and domestic law firms etc.

Some
of the common areas where these graduates can find rewarding offers are:

1.
International
law
firms

Some
of the most famous international law firms visit Indian law schools
for campus interviews year after year like Clifford Chance, Allen and
Overy, Herbert Smith etc. A contract with one of these international
law firms is not only rewarding but also a great training and
learning experience for young law graduates.

2.
Consulting and
advisory
companies

There
is a huge list of consulting and advisory companies both Indian and
international. These companies visit law school campuses every year
to hire the best talent. They are the biggest source of placement for
top law schools of India. Top Indian law firms like Amarchand
Mangaldas, Luthra and Luthra, Nishit Desai Associates and many more
firms are regularly hiring best talent.

3.
Legal departments of MNCs and corporate
s

Almost
all MNCs and corporate houses have their own legal departments;
Companies like Tata, Reliance, Wipro, Infosys, Proctor & Gamble,
and PepsiCo etc. Government sector banks like SBI, Union Bank of
India, Central Bank of India, private and MNC banks like ICICI, HDFC,
Citibank, American Express, Insurance companies, Telecom companies
like Bharti Airtel, Idea, Vodafone etc. hire law
graduates
as corporate legal advisers
or associates in their legal team, these teams do not only look at
regular company affairs but also work on complex matters like mergers
and acquisitions,
debt
restructuring with banks and institutions.

4.
Legal process outsourcing

This
is a relatively new source of employment for law graduates. This
segment of legal work has grown rapidly in the last eight to ten
years, these firms hire law graduates to work on projects for
attorneys in USA and UK. Attorneys in developed countries like to
outsource part of their work to be completed by very talented team of
lawyers sitting at offshore locations.

5.
NGOs

NGOs is India take up complex tasks and thus have to get through tons of
legal formalities; these could be related to various legal
permissions, approvals, financing, distribution etc. The NGOs hire
law graduates in their team to ensure they get their legal
formalities completed by in-house lawyers at a fast pace and in a
cost effective manner.

6.
Opportunity for higher studies in
international
law
schools

Indian
law graduates
from top universities also opt for higher studies in top universities
in USA, Canada and UK; this can lead them to a highly rewarding
career with International and domestic law
firms.

Editorial NOTE: This article is categorized under
Opinion Section. The views expressed in this article are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of
merinews.com. In case you have a opposing view, please click
here to share the same in the comments section.

Go to Source

Financial Poise™ Announces “Representing Buyers and Sellers of Commercial Property,” of the Real Estate Law Webinar Series, Premiering May 18th through West LegalEdcenter

Financial Poise™ Webinars and West LegalEdcenter are pleased to announce the May 18th premiere of a new webinar “Representing Buyers and Sellers of Commercial Real Property,” designed to introduce attorneys and business owners to the basics of commercial real estate transactions. Moderator Tal Izraeli of Levenfeld Pearlstein joins panelists from firms including PahRoo Appraisal & Consultancy, Bronson & Kahn, NRC Realty & Capital Advisors, and Dykema to discuss due diligence, a typical purchase and key contract provisions for commercial real estate.

Chicago, IL (PRWEB) May 14, 2017

Whether as a direct owner or investor in real estate, or as a business owner requiring a lease or ownership of a property to house a business, it is a good idea to have some basic knowledge of real estate law. Likewise, a general practitioner must be able to issue spot and respond to general questions clients may have. Either way, this Financial Poise webinar series provides important basic knowledge and insight into the most fundamental and common of real estate transactions.

The fifth episode of the Real Estate Law Dumbed Down series, “Representing Buyers and Sellers of Commercial Real Property,” (Register Here) airs on May 18th at 2pm and features Moderator Tal Izraeli of Levenfeld Pearlstein. Tal is joined by Michael Hobbs of PahRoo Appraisal & Consultancy, Michael Weis of Dykema, Max Kanter of Bronson & Kahn and David Levy of NRC Realty & Capital Advisors.

This webinar provides a broad overview of the real estate “deal.” That is, it walks through a typical purchase and sale agreement for commercial real estate. Topics covered include due diligence, title and survey, the contract itself (with a review and discussion of many key provisions), and the closing.

Each episode is delivered in Plain English understandable to business owners and executives without much background in these areas, yet is proven to be valuable to seasoned professionals. Each episode in the series brings you into engaging, sometimes humorous, conversations designed to entertain as it teaches. And, as with all Financial Poise Webinars, each episode in the series is designed to be viewed independently of the other episodes, so that participants will enhance their knowledge of this area whether they attend one, some, or all of the episodes.

ABOUT FINANCIAL POISE™:

Financial Poise™ (http://www.financialpoise.com ) provides unbiased news, continuing education, and intelligence to private business owners, executives, investors, and their trusted advisors. For more information contact Jennifer Storch at jstorch(at)financialpoise(dot)com or 312-469-0135.

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/Real-Estate-Law/Commercial-Buy-Sell/prweb14333456.htm

Go to Source

City law firm in tie-up to serve German banks

City law firm RPC has today announced an international expansion to extend its offering into the German banking sector.

RPC will work with corporate finance and advisory firm Giltspur to offer advisory, investigatory and legal solutions to the sector.

Read more: Business need to draft their own Brexit deals, according to Miriam Gonzalez

The new service, which will be called Giltspur RPC Financial, will draw on German consulting business Excellory to offer the banks services including dispute resolution and risk mitigation strategies, litigation funding solutions, asset disposals, acquisitions and regulatory capital relief.

“It is well known that the German banking sector has been dealing with some fundamental structural issues over the past few years driven by a range of factors, including the low interest rate environment, European sovereign risk and regulatory pressure,” said Simon Hart, a partner in RPC’s commercial litigation team.

“The unique combination of services offered by Giltspur RPC Financial will help our clients identify any internal issues quickly, and then offer commercial solutions that mitigate future financial risk.”

Read more: This Magic Circle law firm is on the hunt for tech firms to team up with

He added: “In those situations where our client might be wrestling with a potential dispute with counterparties or other third parties, then given our strong track record handling banking-related disputes – including experience for German clients – RPC is well placed to help navigate those complex waters.”

RPC, which specialises in litigation, has 86 partners, 300 other lawyers and more than 600 employees in total. It is headquartered in the City, and also has offices in Hong Kong, Singapore and Bristol.

Go to Source

Senate tackles banks over oil firms’ $63b capital flight

‘Cash taken out under suspicious circumstances between 2009 and 2014’

The Senate is investigating some banks for alleged collusion with some international oil companies (IOCs) to defraud the country.

Over $62,909,716,417 is said to have been taken out of the country under suspicious circumstances between August 2009 and December 2014.

The “Investigation of the pre-shipment inspection of export activities in Nigeria” is being conducted by the Senate joint committee on Finance, Trade and Investment, Gas, Petroleum Upstream, Banking, Insurance and other Financial Institutions, Judiciary, Human Rights and Legal Matters, and Customs and Excise.

A document obtained by The Nation showed  the banks were asked to submit copies of certified Nigeria Export Proceed (NXP) issued/or processed by them in respect of all crude oil and gas exported by Nigeria Agip Company Ltd, Chevron Nigeria Limited, Shell Petroleum Dev. Co. Nig. Ltd and their affiliates between April 1996 and December, 2016.

The banks are to submit all domiciliary accounts opened and /or closed within the period specified for crude oil and gas exported.

Two banks – Citibank and Standard Chartered Bank – appeared at the investigative joint committee on Thursday. Other banks said to be associated with the export of oil and gas will also appear.

A member of the committee, Senator Yusuf Yusuf (Taraba State), queried why funds brought into the country as oil export proceeds were wholly withdrawn a day after such proceeds were brought.

He said the probe became necessary because the banks should have ensured petroleum products exporters did the right thing by obeying the guidelines and laws of the country.

Yusuf said: “It is worrisome that money comes in today, tomorrow the same amount goes out of the country. The practice runs through statement of account submitted by the banks. The oil companies bring in $20 billion today and tomorrow $20 billion is taken out from the account.

“The banks are colluding with multi-national oil companies to defraud the country. The government relies on the banks; the banks are now colluding with the multi-national oil companies.”

He noted that it was obvious the country was not getting the correct export proceeds from oil and gas exports.

The lawmaker, who insisted that banks had the responsibility to abide by the law, said it was worrisome no indications were made about who paid for oil exports.

He noted that the committee was interested in why same company exports and pays for products without an indication of who actually buys the products and the corresponding bank.

The Chairman of the joint committee, Senator John Enoh, said the committee was interested in ensuring that banks are not colluding with IOCs to flout the laws of the country.

Enoh said the committee would take a critical look at the submissions made by the banks to come to terms with the true position of oil and gas exports proceeds processes.

A document submitted to the committee, which was obtained by The Nation, showed that Citibank Nigeria operates domiciliary export proceed accounts for ENI Group (three accounts), Chevron Group (six accounts) and Shell Group (two accounts).

The document also showed that Nigerian Agip Oil Company recorded a total export inflow valued at $15,372, 882,703.36

Chevron Group recorded $44,020,596,289.99. Shell group made a total inflow valued at $3,516,237,425.79 giving total of $62,909,716,417 billion.

The committee resolved to screen documents submitted by the banks before coming up with its recommendations.

The committee expressed its determination to get to the root of  pre-shipment inspection of export activities.


Tags:

Go to Source

Govt looks to scrap deposit insurance norm under company law

Companies may accept deposits without deposit insurance contract till March 31, 2018.

New Delhi: The government is considering doing away with the mandatory deposit insurance requirement for deposit-taking firms under the company law. The deposit insurance provision is part of the Companies Act, 2013 but is yet to be made operational.

The Corporate Affairs Ministry, which is implementing the Act, has been extending the deadline for implementation of this particular provision. Sources said the ministry is looking at scrapping the deposit insurance requirement as suitable insurance product for the purpose is not available in the market.

The view has emerged that it would be difficult to have such an insurance product, they added. Implementation of the deposit insurance provision has been delayed over the years.

A significant part of the Companies Act came into force from April 1, 2014. This provision of the Act was made as part of larger efforts to safeguard the interest of investors amid instances of ponzi schemes. In a notification issued on May 11, the ministry again extended the deadline for complying with the deposit insurance norm to March 2018.

Interestingly, the ministry had proposed doing away with the norm in the bill introduced in 2016 to amend the Companies Act. It had proposed omitting requirement relating to deposit insurance and provide that deposit repayment reserve should not be less than 20 per cent of the amount of deposits maturing during the following financial year.

The bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha in March 2016 and then it was referred to the Standing Committee on Finance. The panel submitted its report on the legislation in December 2016. In March this year, the Cabinet approved the amendments to the bill after taking into consideration the suggestions made by the panel.

However, the bill was not introduced during the Budget session of Parliament that ended last month. Sources said the revised bill has retained the proposal to omit deposit insurance clause. Meanwhile the notification issued by the Ministry on May 11 has amended the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014.

“…  the companies may accept deposits without deposit insurance contract till March 31, 2018 or till the availability of deposit insurance product, whichever is earlier,” the notification said. 

Go to Source

India in deep slumber as ransomware attacks, says cyber law expert

HYDERABAD: A few hours after the world woke up to the WannaCry ransomware attack on Saturday, the Telangana state police put out the usual ‘no need to panic’ message.

T Krishna Prasad, additional director-general for technical computer services said the Telangana police website was working well enough, why worry?

Later in the day, S Jayaram, assistant commissioner of police in the cyber crime division of Cyberabad followed up with a wise advisory: “So far we have not received any complaints. Servers must be secured. Systems must be protected with licensed software. The public must refrain from using pirated software. People should be careful about the emails they receive and check before downloading any email attachment.”

However, Supreme Court lawyer and cyber law expert Pawan Duggal said the WannaCry ransomware attack was a clear case of the world caught napping. And India is in deep slumber. “These are only initial reports. Only 24 hours have passed. The actual damage could be far more considering that cyber security is lax in India,” Duggal said.

“India is a green field for cyber crime as ransomware does not come under the IT Act or under the Indian Penal Code. There is no national cyber security legislation that can elaborate the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders. As the threat has originated from beyond India, the investigations will end up at a dead end,” he added.

Bipin Chandra, the former president of Hyderabad Software Enterprises Association (HYSEA), said Indian IT companies are better placed to withstand a ransomware attack. “They have a heightened sense of security as a vast majority of them are B2B services firms. Their clients ask for a certain level of certification and regular audits. So security awareness is high,” he added.

Ransomware attacks are nothing new, he said. Organisations that don’t want to be vulnerable to attacks of the WannaCry kind should get their systems audited. System audit firms identify vulnerabilities and suggest hardware and software to plug the gaps.

Back in September 2016, Kerala’s government website was subjected to a ransomware attack. Again, in March this year, the Telangana Forest Department’s local network of 20 computers at its headquarters was found locked by unidentified hackers who locked the files using the RSA-4096 virus. The virus infected the computers after one officer inadvertently downloaded an image file and shared it in the local network. The hackers, suspected to be Russian, then demanded an undisclosed ransom amount to unlock the data.

However, the department failed to kill the ransomware as its encryption with a strong algorithm proved to be be a tough nut to crack.

As a member of the 25-member IT wing (Forest Management Information System, FMIS) of the department told New Indian Express then, “Being a government department, we could not think of paying the hackers a ransom. Besides, there was no guarantee that the hackers would restore the data after payment. The only option left was to forgo the data.”

After losing the battle to hackers, FMIS officials deleted the files in the affected computers and beefed up their IT security.

According to NIC, this was the first reported case of ransomware attack on a public system in the state.

Go to Source

Foreign firms fall into line levying GST on online television, music and software

Netflix passed on the cost of GST in full to Kiwi subscribers in November, with price rises of between $2 and $2.50 a month.

MIKE BLAKE/REUTERS

Netflix passed on the cost of GST in full to Kiwi subscribers in November, with price rises of between $2 and $2.50 a month.

Most large foreign companies appear to be collecting GST on digital services they sell to New Zealanders, confounding the hopes of some consumers who hoped they wouldn’t play ball with the new law.  

A rule change that took effect in October, means foreign companies are supposed to add GST to the likes of internet television, streamed music,e-books and online computer games and software they that sell to Kiwi consumers from overseas.

The rule only applies if companies sell more than $60,000 of such services to New Zealanders each year.

There were doubts foreign firms would play ball, given Inland Revenue has no easy way to force compliance on companies that don’t have a presence in the country.

READ MORE:
* Australian delay means NZ could move in tandem on GST, says Retail NZ
* Spotify put GST on its invoices when it was not collecting the tax

But Inland Revenue said 135 foreign companies had registered to levy GST, in accordance with the law change. 

They are known to include most of the companies most impacted by the change, including Netflix and online music company Spotify.

Spotify increased the price of its premium streamed music service by $2 in January, and now charges $14.99 a month. Netflix also increased its prices by between $2 and $2.50 in November to reflect the GST change.

Inland Revenue spokesman Baden Campbell, said the tax department hadn’t attempted to estimate how many foreign companies should have registered to collect the tax.   

Some companies were still registering, suggesting compliance was not yet universal.

Ad Feedback

But PwC tax partner Geof​ Nightingale, said the level of compliance appeared high. “I would assume that inside the 135 are most of the ‘big names’ that account for a big volume of digital services.”

Inland Revenue has forecast the tax change will bring in about $40 million a year.   

The Australian government is set to delay a broader tax change that would oblige foreign companies to levy GST on both digital services and physical goods that they ship to Australians.

The law change – which is being closely watched by New Zealand officials and lobbyists – was due to take effect in July.

But a senate committee has recommended delaying it until July next year.

Retail NZ spokesman Greg Harford said on Thursday, that the delay would mean New Zealand and Australia could move in tandem to ensure GST was levied on all overseas internet shopping purchases.

But Nightingale believed the delay would take some heat off the New Zealand government to move quickly on the issue.


 – Stuff

Go to Source